The global solution for human resource professionals, combines custom research, strategic white papers, country primers, webinars and OnDemand educational programs, and the expert guidance...
Dec. 13 — Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc. discriminated against a class of information technology employees by terminating them and outsourcing their work to contractors that employ workers with temporary visas, a lawsuit alleges ( Pererro v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. , M.D. Fla., No. 16-3383, complaint filed 12/12/16 ).
Thirty former IT employees brought national origin and race discrimination claims under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 U.S.C. § 1981) against Disney in a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
This is the third time that Disney has faced a lawsuit from laid-off workers alleging they were unlawfully replaced by foreign workers. In October, a federal judge dismissed two complaints—against HCL America Inc. and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., and Cognizant Technology Solutions and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc.—under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act alleging that Disney and the two IT staffing firms conspired to lie to the federal government about whether U.S. citizens would be displaced by workers with temporary H-1B work visas.
In recent years, the broader issue of whether replacing U.S. workers with visa holders is discriminatory has been considered by the Justice Department. The agency last December issued a technical assistance letter stating that, in certain circumstances, terminating U.S. workers and replacing them with temporary work visa holders could amount to citizenship status discrimination under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
A Senate Judiciary subcommittee also heard testimony in February on alleged employer abuse of the H-1B visa program. And in August, a bipartisan group of House members announced a bill ( H.R. 5801) that would raise salary thresholds that trigger a requirement for companies to attest to the federal government that they aren’t displacing U.S. employees by hiring more H-1B workers.
Other companies that have come under fire because of H-1B practices include Southern California Edison, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. and Infosys Ltd. The Labor Department in September 2015 cleared Infosys of wrongdoing related to its H-1B applications.
Attorney Sara Blackwell of the Blackwell Firm in Sarasota, Fla., represents the discharged workers in the three lawsuits brought against Disney. She’s joined by Luis A. Cabassa of Wenzel Fenton Cabassa in Tampa, Fla., for the most recent litigation.
The business model of terminating U.S. employees and outsourcing the jobs to contractors that hire workers on temporary visas is an attempt by companies to “create a barrier” against national origin and race discrimination claims, Blackwell told Bloomberg BNA Dec. 13.
That’s because the contractor’s workers generally wouldn’t be considered “employees” of the outsourcing company. Only employees can bring discrimination claims under Title VII and other workplace anti-bias laws.
Although companies like Disney aren’t directly hiring the visa holders who replace the discharged employees, they should be considered joint employers of the foreign workers who are employed by the contractors, Blackwell argued.
The visa holders are using Disney property, and Disney managers exercise control over the foreign workers, she said.
“Disney is and should be an employer of the foreigners that are taking over the American jobs,” said Blackwell, who also heads Protect U.S. Workers, a nonprofit organization against outsourcing and offshoring of American jobs.
A Disney spokeswoman told Bloomberg BNA that the company denies the lawsuit’s allegations.
“Like the two other dismissed cases brought by this lawyer, this latest lawsuit is nonsense and we will defend it vigorously,” she said in a Dec. 13 statement.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jay-Anne B. Casuga in Washington at email@example.com
The lawsuit is at http://src.bna.com/kIJ.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)