From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
Drivers for Uber’s high-end black car service aren’t employees entitled to minimum wage or overtime, a federal judge ruled.
The decision is the first judicial determination on the classification of UberBLACK drivers. Whether gig workers are correctly classified as contractors or employees is a long-running issue. Companies have generally beat back or settled such disputes without a definitive finding.
The settlements can include eye-popping amounts, such as the $27 million figure Lyft and drivers in March jointly said was proceeding on schedule, and the $100 million Uber settlement that a judge rejected as too small.
The drivers aren’t employees because the company doesn’t exercise sufficient control over them, Judge Michael M. Baylson said in the most recent case. The terms under which Uber and the black car service drivers operate spell out a number of ways in which the company isn’t allowed to control their work, Baylson said. For example, the company doesn’t require them to work a minimum number of hours or mandate uniforms, he said.
Baylson rejected driver Ali Razak’s contention that the company’s decision to deactivate him following a conviction for driving while intoxicated was an exercise of control. It was an expression of its sense of responsibility toward customers, the judge said.
Degree of control is a crucial factor in worker classification cases. A judge ruled in February that Raef Lawson, a former delivery driver for food ordering service Grubhub, was correctly classified as an independent contractor rather than as an employee because he operated with a large amount of independence. Lawson’s misclassification case was the first to reach trial and was seen as a bellwether because the San Francisco-based U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, in the heart of the gig economy, is where many similar cases are filed.
The case is Razak v. Uber Techs., Inc., 2018 BL 127756, E.D. Pa., No. 16-573, summary judgment 4/11/18.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)