The gold standard of excellence for more than 80 years, Bloomberg BNA’s The United States Law Week® is the most authoritative way to keep up with important cases and other legal developments...
April 4 — A circuit split may be emerging over the Board of Immigration Appeals's interpretation of “obstruction of justice” for removal purposes, an immigration scholar told Bloomberg BNA.
The BIA's holding that “obstruction of justice” requires intent to interfere with the “process of justice” is unconstitutionally vague because the BIA uses the amorphous phrase “process of justice” without explaining what it means, a divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held March 31 (Gallardo v. Lynch, 2016 BL 100930, 9th Cir., No. 12-72326, 3/31/16).
The majority declined to defer to the BIA's meaning because under a Chevron analysis, it found there is “no clear indication that Congress intended to delegate authority to the agency to push the constitutional boundary.”
But the dissent said this ruling is inconsistent with approaches taken by three other circuits.
According to Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), courts are to defer to agencies' reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutes.
The majority has a “very solid argument” that the interpretation doesn't warrant deference, Kevin R. Johnson, Dean of the University of California, Davis, law school and contributor to the ImmigrationProf Blog, told Bloomberg BNA.
Some other circuits, however, have deferred to the interpretation, Johnson said.
The agency's interpretation in this case “is so broad it's arguably unconstitutional,” Johnson said.
The BIA is “overreaching” and “expansively interpreting” obstruction of justice, he said.
“It gives you the sense they're trying to rig the game to deport anybody they can who's got a criminal conviction,” Johnson said.
This interpretation contrasts with the BIA's earlier, more “limited” one in In re Espinoza-Gonzalez, 22 I & N Dec. 889 (B.I.A. 1999), Johnson said.
In that case, the BIA determined that a crime is an “obstruction of justice” when it interferes with an ongoing proceeding. This is a “plausible construction,” the Ninth Circuit said.
It remanded for the BIA to consider a new construction or to apply its earlier interpretation from Espinoza-Gonzalez.
“Contrary to the dissent's assertion, our decision does not create or exacerbate a circuit split,” Judge Morgan Christen's majority opinion said.
The majority's approach of denying deference is inconsistent with the Second, Fifth and Eighth circuits—which have found nothing uncertain about the BIA's formulation—and has created or perpetuated a circuit split, Judge J. Michael Seabright, sitting by designation from the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, said in his dissent.
“The court should defer to the BIA's reasonable, permissible and plausible interpretation” of “obstruction of justice,” Seabright said.
Judge Sidney R. Thomas joined in the majority opinion.
The Law Office of Ricci & Sprouls represented Gallardo. The Department of Justice represented the government.
To contact the reporter on this story: Melissa Stanzione in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jeffrey D. Koelemay at email@example.com
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)