Stay ahead of developments in federal and state health care law, regulation and transactions with timely, expert news and analysis.
By Sara Hansard
The Trump administration should end Congress’ special treatment for Obamacare subsidies, which would give lawmakers an incentive to repeal the law, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla). said July 31.
They spoke on a conference call with reporters about requiring members of Congress to sign up for exchange plans without subsidies, which they said is required under the Affordable Care Act. Until members of Congress “are put in that exact same position” as people who are required by the law to buy coverage but who aren’t eligible for much financial support, “we are not going to address the root cause of this problem. We’re not going to bring down premiums,” Johnson said.
The Obama administration Office of Personnel Management published a final rule in October 2013 allowing members of Congress and their approximately 12,000 staff members to enroll in the District of Columbia’s small business exchange even though small business exchanges are normally reserved for companies with fewer than 50 employees.
The rule also allowed members of Congress and staff to receive subsidies to cover the cost of their care, which other businesses are not allowed to provide pre-tax funds for exchange enrollees’ premium payments. Some members of Congress have fought the rule, arguing it is illegal under the ACA and it provides special advantages to Congress and staff members that the public doesn’t enjoy.
Repealing the OPM regulation “means that Congress itself won’t get relief until and unless, and to the same extent as, voters do,” Heather Higgins, president and chief executive officer of Independent Women’s Voice, said on the call. IWV supports free-market economic solutions and it hosted the call.
President Donald Trump tweeted July 29 and July 31, suggesting that “bailouts” for insurance companies and members of Congress “will end very soon” if a health care bill isn’t approved quickly, and Congress should be “paying what public pays.”
But those threats are “not enough,” because they could result in “the worst of all possible worlds,” Higgins said.
That could result in “some sort of a lousy, partial repeal-replace that leaves voters very unsatisfied, and yet an obligation to continue this double-standard for Congress,” Higgins said.
“He should be very clear that he is instructing the Office of Personnel Management that Congress is not a small business—whether or not they vote for repeal—and that Congress will be treated under the Affordable Care Act as the law intended like everyone who is on the exchanges, and to the extent that the American people get relief, Congress will get relief,” she said.
That would tell Congress “that they will be eating their own cooking, which will radically improve what’s on that menu,” Higgins said.
Both Democrats and Republicans in Congress “desperately do not want to be on the exchanges,” which will guarantee that the administration can get the votes they need to change the ACA, she said.
The OPM didn’t respond to Bloomberg BNA’s request for comment.
During debate over the ACA Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) won approval of an amendment that required members of Congress and their staffs to enroll in the exchanges, Hadley Heath Manning, director of policy for the Independent Women’s Voice, told Bloomberg BNA. “If they passed it, it’s a law and they ought to follow it,” she said.
Prior to the ACA, members of Congress and staff were covered by the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, and the government paid most of their premiums in the same way that most employers pay workers’ premiums.
The attempt to rescind government payments for exchange coverage for congressional employees is “an obviously vindictive thing to do to give Congress a pay cut if they don’t pass this legislation,” Andy Slavitt, former acting administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, told Bloomberg BNA. Slavitt is now a senior adviser with the Bipartisan Policy Center.
“We’re only going to be able to go so far based on threats,” he said of Trump’s tweets.
If congressional staff members didn’t receive subsidies to help pay their health insurance premiums, “we can raise our staff’s pay,” DeSantis said. But congressional members can’t change their own pay without voting on it, “and a lot of members don’t want to have to pay more. They don’t want to be in that same boat” as people who must buy covering through the exchanges without subsidies, he said.
The House approved legislation in September 2013 attached to a budget continuing resolution striking the OPM rule, but the measure was killed in the Senate, which was then controlled by Democrats, DeSantis said. “It really was a bailout, because they’re getting around what the statute ultimately provides for.”
However, “it’s very unpopular inside of Congress” to repeal the OPM rule, DeSantis said. “But once it’s teed up and you’ve got to go on record, it’s a little bit different ball game at that point. So I’m hoping that this could maybe help us get back to the table and actually do what we promised the voters we would do.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Sara Hansard at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Kendra Casey Plank at firstname.lastname@example.org
The Office of Personnel Management final rule is at http://src.bna.com/rhS.President Trump's Aug. July 29 Tweet is at https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/891334415347060736. His July 31 Tweet is at https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/891996053611917312.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)