Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
By Brian Dabbs
Nov. 2 — The Environmental Protection Agency’s insistence that it is complying with small businesses outreach rules as it crafts a hardrock mining insurance proposal is being challenged by a top Senate Republican.
Senate Small Business Committee Chairman David Vitter (R-La.) contested EPA compliance with those statutory rules to Bloomberg BNA Nov. 1, just weeks after Vitter and a Republican colleague argued the EPA is falling short on the outreach.
Meanwhile, EPA spokeswoman Monica Lee told Bloomberg BNA the agency is continuing to receive input from a small business panel in line with the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA), a 1996 statute that amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The hardrock mining financial assurance proposal (RIN:2050-AG61), which is nearing a court-mandated Dec. 1 finalization, aims to secure insurance tools, such as bonds and sureties, to cover any hazardous discharges under Superfund law. The proposal is currently undergoing review at the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) which often includes meetings with interested parties.
Hardrock mining extracts minerals that contain gold, silver, iron, copper, zinc, nickel, tin, lead and other metals, as opposed to, for instance, coal. The EPA says it will exempt certain categories of facilities from requiring assurances, such as mines less than five acres in size and stream bed mines that don’t use hazardous substances.
“[President Barack] Obama and his political EPA’s failure to listen to small business concerns has been a big problem of this Administration,” Vitter told Bloomberg BNA. “Paying small businesses lip service and going through the motions is not good enough, and we expect the EPA to actually use the information given by these hardrock mining businesses to ensure unnecessary burdens are not being implemented on the industry.”
The EPA “failed” to include small business representatives in its rulemaking process and therefore violated the law, Rachel Ledbetter, a Vitter spokeswoman, told Bloomberg BNA.
EPA’s Lee declined to release information to Bloomberg BNA on the number of small businesses likely to be affected by the rulemaking, saying that information will surface following the early December release of the proposal.
Companies have litigated against rulemakings citing noncompliance with SBREFA and the Regulatory Flexibility Act in the past.
The EPA identifies mining small businesses as operations with 1,500 employees or less. That will require roughly 65 small businesses to comply with the new rulemaking, Colorado-based Michael Herrmann, a mining insurance expert with Legacy Risk Solutions LLC, said citing EPA communications.
Bonnie Gestring, a mining expert with the nonprofit environmental advocacy group Earthworks, suggested the proposal is likely to force compliance from a broad range of small businesses.
“I suspect that will include a lot of facilities, since 1,500 employees is a large number these days—particularly in light of increased mechanization within the industry,” said Gestring.
In contrast with industry and Western states, Earthworks is a staunch supporter of the rulemaking, citing EPA’s past needs to expend public resources associated with reclamation of abandoned mines.
“Regardless of size, financial assurance is a reasonable cost of doing business, given that metal mining is the leading source of toxic releases in the U.S.,” she told Bloomberg BNA. “The intent of the proposed rule is to protect taxpayers from incurring the cost of mine clean-up.” Gestring pointed to Alaskan state information on its mining industry, which reveals a workforce of less than 1,500 employees at all “major mines.”
Beth Botsis, deputy director of the Interstate Mining Compact Commission, told Bloomberg BNA small business representatives are opposed to both EPA’s outreach and what they know about the plan.
In late August, the agency convened a Small Business Advocacy Review panel, consisting of EPA, Small Business Administration and OMB officials, Mathy Stanislaus, EPA Assistant Administrator, told Vitter in a September letter.
Small business representatives deliver commentary on the proposal to the panel, the EPA says.
The August panel launch would have teed up an EPA report by late October on small business and other implications of the proposal, the letter said.
“The EPA takes its responsibilities related to the Regulatory Flexibility Act and SBREFA seriously,” Stanislaus said. “Throughout the proposed rulemaking process, the EPA has provided information to enable the [small business representatives] and other interested parties to understand our current thinking and provide us with individual input.”
A Bloomberg BNA Freedom of Information Act request disclosed an August letter crafted by Senators Vitter and Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) and sent to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, which challenged EPA SBREFA compliance, prompting Bloomberg BNA’s contact with Vitter’s office and the agency.
The August letter cites an EPA April communication with small business representatives and an early June meeting with those representatives. An EPA spokeswoman didn’t respond to a request to release documentation linked to that outreach effort.
To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Dabbs in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)