Stay current on the latest developments from agencies including the CFPB, Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC to advise clients on real-life regulatory situations.
Natural gas companies including Xcel Energy Inc., CMS Energy Corp., and Dynegy Inc. may be headed to trial over allegations of fixing prices in the early 2000s, bringing to a close a massive 14-year effort to resolve discovery and other pretrial disputes ( In re Western States Wholesale Nat. Gas Antitrust Litig. (Learjet, Inc. v. ONEOK Inc.) , D. Nev., No. 2:03-cv-01431-RCJ-PAL Case No. 2:06-cv-00233-RCJ-PAL Case No. 2:07-cv-00987-RCJ-PAL, 6/5/17 ).
The consolidated class action in a Nevada federal court has involved virtually all U.S. Western natural gas traders as defendants. The plaintiffs alleged that these companies used market tricks and manipulation in 2001 and 2002 to drive up prices and caused a market crisis in western states. Over the years, some defendants have settled while other have litigated aggressively. The case has already resulted in at least two appeals to the circuit court and one to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The case now is headed into a new phase. With discovery concluded and several defendants out of the case, the consolidated litigation should soon be broken into its constituent parts and returned to the federal courts in which each was filed for trial. Having done their pre-trial work together in one court, each putative class of plaintiffs will return to its home state for a separate trial. Dispositive motions from both sides are pending and fully briefed in the case.
Polsinelli P.C. partner Russell S. Jones , Jr. in Kansas City, who represents most of the plaintiffs, told Bloomberg BNA he looks forward to seeing the case reach a jury. “We believe the plaintiffs paid hundreds of millions more for gas than they should have,” he said, adding that he’d like to see them finally get full recovery at trial.
The cases that remain are as follows: Xcel Energy and its subsidiary E Prime Energy are defendants in all of the four remaining putative class actions — in Missouri, Wisconsin, Kansas, and Colorado. El Paso Energy Corp. and CMS are defendants in the Wisconsin plaintiffs’ action, which also involves companies related to The Williams Companies Inc., Dynegy, and Reliant Energy Inc.
The Missouri and Kansas plaintiffs are also pursuing claims against Dynegy, Williams, and Reliant.
As of June 5, the court dismissed American Electric Power Co. Inc. and AEP Energy Services Inc., Coral Energy Resources LP, Duke Energy Trading and Marketing LLC and Duke Energy Carolinas LLC, ONEOK Inc. and ONEOK Energy Services Co. LP following settlements.
Also on June 5, Judge Robert C. Jones granted preliminary approval on two more settlements that plaintiff groups from Kansas and Missouri reached in January with El Paso Corp. and El Paso Merchant Energy, and CMS Energy, CMS Energy Resources Management Co., and CMS Field Services, Inc. CMS will pay the settling classes $5.125 million, and El Paso will pay $10 million.
The consolidated case dates to the Enron Corp. energy scandal of 2001 when deregulated energy markets and new trading technologies led to an energy crisis in western states. California had suffered an emergency as energy prices soared 266 percent from 1999 to 2000, leading to rolling blackouts.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) capped wholesale electricity rates in April 2001, and in May issued a bombshell report showing that Enron traders had created phony traffic and congestion on California’s energy grids. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) alleged in Senate hearings at the time that the fraud amounted to $8.9 billion in electricity rate overcharges.
Lawsuits followed alleging that other natural gas traders fixed prices through wash trades (buying and selling the same commodity) and other manipulative tactics. They were consolidated in Nevada in 2003.
To contact the reporter on this story: Eleanor Tyler in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Fawn Johnson at firstname.lastname@example.org
The court's preliminary approval for the El Paso and CMS settlements is at http://src.bna.com/pyk.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)