International Environment Reporter™ helps you understand environmental laws, regulations, policies and trends in major industrialized and developing nations, as well as in international governmental...
June 16 — The European Parliament claimed a partial success June 16 in ensuring that profits from minerals and metals do not reach armed groups by including mandatory obligations for some companies in a regulation that will be the European Union's version of Section 1502 of the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act.
Parliament negotiators reached a provisional agreement with counterparts from the Council of the European Union, which represents the governments of EU countries, that importers that bring gold, tantalum, tin or tungsten into the bloc from conflict regions should be required to carry out due diligence checks on their suppliers to ensure that profits are not being funneled back to warlords.
The provisional agreement marks a strengthening of a plan, published in March 2014 by the European Commission, the EU's executive, under which companies were encouraged to participate in a voluntary self-certification program.
The provisional agreement would require mandatory reporting from some companies—like those that import into the EU the minerals and metals as raw materials—and request voluntary disclosure from other companies, like those whose finished products contain some of the so-called conflict minerals.
Bernd Lange, a German center-left lawmaker who chairs the European Parliament's trade committee, said agreement on the regulation, or uniform EU-wide law, was a “big, big step” that will “change the situation of people on the ground in conflict regions.”
The regulation would cover all conflict regions worldwide, unlike Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which requires declarations of conflict minerals only from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjacent countries and has led to “discrimination” against those countries, Lange said.
In practice, the mandatory due diligence requirements in the EU regulation would cover a few hundred companies involved in the smelting or import of the minerals. Smaller companies trading in minerals for specialist applications, such as dentistry, would be exempt.
The much larger number of companies, such as electronics manufacturers, that use the minerals in their products would not have a due diligence obligation, but would be asked to voluntarily disclose details of their sourcing of the minerals.
Amnesty International criticized this element of the agreement. Iverna McGowan, Amnesty International EU office head and advocacy director, said the deal “leaves companies that import minerals in their products entirely off the hook,” and “will only hold companies importing the raw materials to basic checks.”
But Iuliu Winkler, a Romanian center-right lawmaker who led negotiations for the European Parliament on the draft regulation, said a review clause was included that would allow an assessment of “the degree of uptake by European Union companies” of voluntary disclosure.
The review would allow EU lawmakers to “improve if necessary the regulation,” Winkler said.
The draft regulation would require—at a date to be specified—the drawing up of a list of areas considered to be conflict areas, to which the due diligence obligations would apply.
Recycled metals and minerals would be excluded from the scope of the requirements.
The provisional agreement on the regulation is subject to ratification by the European Parliament. No date was given for the draft regulation to be put to a vote.
The Parliament previously backed a stricter version of the law, voting in May 2015 for the mandatory due diligence requirements to be extended to all companies using minerals from conflict areas in their products.
To contact the reporter on this story: Stephen Gardner in Brussels at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Greg Henderson at email@example.com
The European Parliament procedure file on the conflict minerals regulation is available at http://src.bna.com/fYB .
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)