From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
By Jaclyn Diaz
The Obama administration’s 2011 rule to ban certain tip pooling arrangements between front-of-house workers who earn tips and back-of-house workers who don’t is currently being challenged by employers in court. Now the DOL’s new proposal to rescind the rule may eventually lead to a lawsuit from worker advocates.
Lawyers tell Ben Penn in a story today they’re considering a potential lawsuit to block the rule, which they brand as President Donald Trump’s regulation to let restaurants steal their servers’ tips by allowing managers to share in the pools. The lawyers told Ben any lawsuit will not happen until after the DOL publishes a final version of the new rule. The takeaway for now is that the unexpectedly loud backlash following the DOL’s announcement that it wants to scrap the Obama rule isn’t going away any time soon.
Ben reported Thursday that DOL Solicitor Kate O’Scannlain could face some heat over her involvement in the new tip pool rulemaking. An ethics review recently determined that she won’t need to recuse herself even though her father, a federal appeals court judge, slammed the Obama rule in a related case.
More Oregonians are stashing away their pennies under the nation’s first state-run retirement program for private sector workers, Madison Alder reports. California, Illinois, Maryland, and Connecticut are poised to follow soon with similar programs.
Oregon’s program is now three months old, and 300 employers registered with the system and 19,230 employees had active accounts as of Jan. 24, a spokesman for the program tells Madison. Workers can choose to opt out of the program. To date, about 20 percent of employees who would be eligible for the program had opted out.
Oregon’s program, like those in other states, requires businesses that don’t already offer a retirement savings plan to register with the program so their employees can be enrolled automatically in individual retirement accounts. The programs faced a hurdle when an Obama-era rule giving them the OK was pulled back by the Labor Department at the direction of Congress in 2017. There’s also a legal challenge pending in a federal court in Oregon over whether certain requirements of the program are barred by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
The Trump administration’s decision to end temporary protected status for Haitians was borne of race discrimination and part of a larger agenda to reduce the number of immigrants of color coming to the U.S., the NAACP says in a newly filed lawsuit, Laura Francis reports.
The organization is basing that conclusion on reported statements earlier this month from President Donald Trump about Haiti and African nations, as well as several statements the president made on the campaign trail about Mexicans and Latinos. There was also an effort by the administration to dig up statistics about Haitians, based on “false anti-Black stereotypes about criminality and exploitation of public benefits,” the NAACP says.
It’s not the first lawsuit to rely on the president’s own statements. Lawsuits over the travel ban also cited Trump’s comments about Muslims in an effort to show the immigration policy discriminates against the Muslim community. The Supreme Court will hear the case over the most recent travel ban this term.
A former police officer can’t proceed on his claim that race, not his use of excessive force on a prisoner, was the reason that the Prince William County Police Department in Virginia fired him, a federal judge ruled. The officer waited more than 90 days to sue after receiving his right-to-sue letter from the EEOC. For this story and more, check out our daily Latest Cases roundup.
“Once again, the Courts have allowed Goliath to force David to pursue his rights in arbitration.”
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)