For over 50 years, Bloomberg Tax’s renowned flagship daily news service, Daily Tax Report® has helped leading practitioners and policymakers stay on the cutting edge of taxation and...
Aug. 18 — Just because an organization is exempt from taxes doesn't mean it should get all city services for free.
That is the message some cities have sent to nonprofit organizations over the last several years, and it is a sentiment that is likely to continue as states feel budget pressure, several attorneys and state tax researchers told Bloomberg BNA. Because nonprofits don't pay property tax, a payment in lieu of tax (PILOT) can help close the gap between the city's lost revenue and the services a nonprofit draws upon.
Making a PILOT may also be just the beginning for nonprofits, as several states are considering whether to scrap the property tax exemption altogether. Local governments lose out on 4 percent to 8 percent of total property tax revenue each year due to the exemption, according to a report released this month by the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
“I definitely think the issue of PILOTs specifically, and more generally the question of what type of financial contributions nonprofits should making to state and local governments, is one that is being increasingly asked, and we’re going to continue to see more activity on that,” said Joseph Crosby, a principal at MultiState Associates Inc.
There is “increasing recognition” that while nonprofits are beneficial to cities, there should be some arrangement to defray costs from the services they consume, Crosby said.
“Is their mission in itself sufficient to overcome the cost imposed on the local community through the need for services? I don't know that there’s a single answer,” he said.
But while a PILOT might benefit a city, it can also raise financial concerns for nonprofits.
As government funding for some nonprofits has decreased, “expecting those same cash-strapped charities to make payments in lieu of taxes threatens their ability to be sustainable and deliver on their mission,” Ellis McGehee Carter, an attorney at Carter Law Group PC, said in an e-mail. And if those organizations are unable to deliver necessary services, the entire community is hurt as a result, she said.
Matthew Hamill, senior vice president of the National Association of College and University Business Officers, said one challenge that comes with PILOTs is that “there can seemingly be no end in sight.”
“It’s difficult for not-for-profits to feel that whatever they might agree to and pay in 2016 could be radically different in just few years—not to their advantage,” he said.
Any agreement should be reached carefully—though negotiations can become contentious, said Adam Langley, a senior research analyst in the Department of Valuation and Taxation at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. If conversations go south, a nonprofit might turn away.
“The obvious downside for the local government there is that these are major institutions in their communities, major employers, they provide lots of benefits—you don’t want to antagonize what is really the good guys in the community,” he said.
Still, some PILOTs make sense—such as a wealthy college making a payment to a town if it would otherwise “threaten the town's survival” by not contributing to the tax base, Carter said.
Several of the largest PILOTs in recent years come from universities, according to data from the Lincoln Institute. Harvard University made a PILOT worth $10 million in 2012. Yale University made an $8.1 million PILOT that year, according to the data.
In a more recent situation, Syracuse University in April reached a deal with the city of Syracuse to contribute $7 million over five years, with the majority funding city services, the Associated Press reported. The university was previously making $500,000 payments annually to the city, according to a 2011 agreement.
The issue has also reached Capitol Hill. Lawmakers, in a letter requesting details on endowment spending, asked several dozen institutions in February if they have made any PILOTs in the past. The Committee on Ways and Means is still reviewing the responses, which tie into a broader focus on tax treatment of endowments (97 DTR G-2, 5/19/16).
But making a PILOT might not be the biggest concern for nonprofits, as some states have recently been reconsidering property tax exemptions entirely.
Maine Gov. Paul R. LePage (R) proposed last year to ax some large nonprofits' property tax exemptions, the Wall Street Journal reported. The state Legislature didn't adopt the proposal, but LePage “remains interested” and may revisit it in the next session, his spokeswoman said.
Dozens of residents in Princeton, N.J., joined a 5-year-old lawsuit in May challenging Princeton University's property tax exemption, which could cut annual property taxes for homeowners by a third. Legislation that would have revoked the tax-exempt status for certain land owned by Yale University failed in May (86 DTR G-3, 5/4/16).
The New Jersey Tax Court stripped Morristown Memorial Hospital of its exemption in June 2015. Atlantic Health System, which owns the center, will pay the town $15.5 million over the next 10 years, NJ Advance Media reported.
“I worry this is going to keep tumbling and getting bigger and bigger,” said Michael Paff, a New Jersey-based lawyer at Paff Law Firm.
In January, the Illinois appellate court in Carle Found. v. Cunningham Twp., 2016 BL 2324, struck down the property tax exemption for hospitals. The Illinois Supreme Court will resume hearing cases in September—though it isn't known if it will schedule an oral argument, said Scott Metcalf, a partner at Franczek Radelet PC.
To contact the reporter on this story: Colleen Murphy in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Cheryl Saenz at firstname.lastname@example.org
Text of the report, “Nonprofit PILOTs (Payments in Lieu of Taxes),” is at http://src.bna.com/hRU.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)