Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
By Avery Fellow
Including construction and demolition materials in the annual federal report tracking the amount of solid waste generated in the United States would encourage recycling and reuse of these materials, recycling companies, state officials, and academic experts said.
The Environmental Protection Agency is considering adding construction and demolition materials, industrial materials, and automotive waste to the report to provide a more comprehensive view of the waste stream in the United States.
“The more expansive EPA's data gathering and annual tracking, the more influence the Agency will have in incentivizing beneficial use,” Waste Management Inc., a waste removal and recycling company, wrote in comments on the proposal posted Sept. 27. The company supports including construction and demolition materials in the report.
EPA said Aug. 2 it may begin including nonhazardous industrial materials in its report measuring the total amount of municipal solid waste generated in the United States. The current EPA report, Municipal Solid Waste in the United States, focuses on materials commonly disposed of by households and commercial establishments, such as paper, glass, metal, and plastic (148 DEN A-5, 8/2/11).
“It is important for recyclers and industries to have an accurate picture of the solid waste landscape so that they can better evaluate available waste streams and identify underutilized opportunities for beneficial uses,” said James Roewer, executive director of the Utility Solid Waste Activities Group, in comments dated Sept. 30.
If nonhazardous industrial wastes were included in the report, manufacturing companies would be more likely to convert their waste streams into materials used by other companies, or to use locally generated waste materials instead of purchased raw materials, Joseph Fiksel, executive director of the Center for Resilience at Ohio State University, wrote in comments dated Aug. 26.
EPA also said it may take another measurement approach in preparing the report. Currently, EPA relies heavily on modeling to estimate the amount of materials in the municipal waste stream.
Samantha MacBride, adjunct assistant professor at Columbia University, recommended in comments dated Sept. 9 that EPA survey nonhazardous industrial waste generators or require biennial reporting.
Larry Christley, planning and financial assistance manager at the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, said he favored mandatory reporting requirements in comments dated Sept. 14, as well as directly surveying local landfills.
Waste Management recommended that EPA use data from local governments and processors and end-market users of recycled material, in addition to data from trade associations.
Derek Swick, senior policy adviser at the American Petroleum Institute, said in comments Sept. 28 the organization does not support adding nonhazardous industrial wastes to the report, citing concerns about additional reporting requirements. The organization said EPA should only collect specific data on nonhazardous waste related to regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, not “just for the sake of the report.”
Strategic Materials Inc., a recycling company, also asked EPA not to include construction and demolition waste, saying that it was already difficult to obtain consistent data on materials in the existing report.
Under current recycling guidelines, for example, recycled glass containing shredded paper, metals, and plastic is considered the same as residue-free recycled glass. EPA should improve the consistency of data for materials currently included in the report before adding materials, the company said in comments dated Sept. 20.
Comments on EPA's proposal to include construction and demolition materials in the municipal solid waste report are available at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2011-0178.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)