By Michael J. Bologna
Nov. 24 — Facebook Inc. is seeking dismissal of a putative class action alleging that the social media giant's use of biometric identification technology violates a one-of-a-kind Illinois privacy statute known as the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) (Gullen v. Facebook Inc., N.D. Ill., 1:15-cv-07681, motion to dismiss 11/20/15).
In its motion to dismiss, filed Nov. 20 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Facebook argued that photographs are not “biometric identifiers” or “biometric information” within the meaning of BIPA.
“The statute expressly defines those terms to exclude both ‘photographs' and any ‘information derived from' photographs,” Facebook wrote in its brief. “Because plaintiff's claim rests entirely on information derived from photographs, his complaint should be dismissed with prejudice.”
Facebook also contended that dismissal is appropriate because the company is not subject to general jurisdiction in Illinois.
Plaintiff Frederick Gullen alleged in his complaint that Facebook used a biometric identifier that extracted data about his face from a photo and saved a template containing that data in its database, but failed to make disclosures and obtain releases as required under BIPA.
The litigation is likely the first of its kind, in which a social media company's use of biometric identification technology is being challenged under a state privacy statute.
Only Illinois and Texas have privacy statutes addressing biometric data, and the Illinois law is unique because it authorizes a private right of action and statutory damages. Enforcement actions under the Texas biometric data law are reserved for the attorney general.
The lawsuit against Facebook is one of two BIPA suits filed in Chicago by the same group of attorneys. Similar allegations were made in June against Shutterfly Inc. (Norberg v. Shutterfly Inc., N.D. Ill., 1:15-cv-05351, filed 6/17/15). The plaintiffs in both actions are represented by Carey, Rodriguez, O'Keefe, Milian, Gonya LLP in Miami, Fla. and Lite, DePalma, Greenberg LLC in Chicago.
The largest players in the technology industry are aware of the significant privacy questions emerging as biometric recognition technologies become more prevalent in consumers' daily lives.
Carl Szabo, policy counsel for the tech industry trade association NetChoice, said industry is working with the Obama Administration and other constituencies on a series of best practices with respect to biometric and facial recognition technologies. The effort is being directed by the Department of Commerce's National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
Szabo told Bloomberg BNA Nov. 24 the group would release a series of recommendations early in 2016.
“We are working on draft best practices that are built on three pillars: transparency, control over sharing, and data security,” Szabo said.
Gullen, who is not a Facebook user, alleged that an acquaintance uploaded a picture of him to the social media site. Facebook automatically scanned and analyzed Gullen's face, extracted his biometric identifiers and used the data to create a template of his face. Gullen alleges Facebook, in violation of BIPA, did not seek or receive his consent for this activity.
The lawsuit seeks to represent a putative class consisting of all “non-Facebook users who, while residing in the State of Illinois, had their biometric identifiers, including ‘face templates’ (or ‘face prints’), collected, captured, received, or otherwise obtained by Facebook.” The suit demands statutory damages of up to $5,000 per violation.
Facebook argued that the plaintiffs' claim is barred by the plain language of BIPA. Facebook noted that photographs and information derived from photographs do not fall under the definition of biometric identifier under the statute. Facebook added that the Illinois General Assembly intended to exclude such data because the law was designed to regulate the use of biometric identifiers as they pertained to financial transactions and security screenings.
“BIPA's express legislative findings and history confirm that these broad exclusions were deliberate: the General Assembly sought to regulate the use of biometric technology to facilitate financial and other secure transactions, and wanted to make clear that other types and uses of technology were not prohibited,” Facebook said in its motion for dismissal.
Facebook is being represented by Lauren R. Goldman in the New York office of Mayer Brown LLP, and Vincent Connelly and Matthew D. Provance of the Chicago office of Mayer Brown.
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael J. Bologna in Chicago at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Thomas O'Toole at firstname.lastname@example.org
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)