Congratulations! You’ve made it through seven sessions of U.S. Supreme Court arguments.
And because you’ve been following along on this blog, you know everything you need to know about this term’s oral arguments. Except, of course, for what happened this week. So let’s get you caught up.
The week began with a bit of déjà vu, with the justices hearing argument in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., No. 15-375.
The justices first heard this copyright dispute back in 2013, when the court clarified the first-sale doctrine.
Now it’s back, but this time the court has been asked to clarify the standard for awarding attorneys’ fees in copyright cases.
Bloomberg BNA IP reporter Anandashankar Mazumdar said the justices were looking for the best way to incentivize parties that have good cases to keep pressing their claims. But that cuts both ways, Anandashankar said.
Read why here (subscription required).
Staying in the world of IP, the justices next heard Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee, No. 15-446.
This one asks if the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s use of the “broadest reasonable interpretation” standard when it reconsiders patents is consistent with the America Invests Act.
Bloomberg BNA IP reporter Tony Dutra says the PTAB’s standard is likely to survive, “if it can get past Chief Justice Roberts's late monkey wrench”—namely, that district courts use a different standard.
Read more about the argument here (subscription required).
On to day two, where the justices heard Mathis v. United States, No. 15-6092.
This one deals, yet again, with the pesky Armed Career Criminal Act. In Mathis, the justices considered “how to interpret state laws to determine whether defendants qualify for longer sentences under the” act, Bloomberg BNA criminal law reporter Jessica De Silva says.
She says the “court's ultimate decision will impact what prosecutors and judges must prove when using certain documents in seeking sentencing enhancements.”
Read her take on the argument here.
Next, the court heard Dietz v. Bouldin, No. 15-458. This one asks what happens “when a jury is dismissed and then immediately re-empaneled after returning a legally impossible verdict,” U.S. Law Week’s Nick Datlowe says.
“The justices expressed concern with the inefficiencies that would be created by a bright-line rule requiring a new trial,” Nick says. But they “also seemed leery of a rule that would require a hazy inquiry into whether jurors had been prejudiced post-discharge.”
Read more from Nick here.
Finally, the court said farewell to oral arguments with McDonnell v. United States, No. 15-474, over the validity of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell’s 2014 corruption conviction.
It seems like the court is going to overturn this one, as they expressed concern that the statute prohibits too much conduct and gives prosecutors too much power over elected officials.
Well… that’s it for this term’s oral arguments.
I know, we’re all sad. But don’t fret! There’s only 22 weeks until the 2016 term’s oral arguments kick off!
Until then, follow along with all the latest Supreme Court news with a free trial to United States Law Week.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)