A seller of goods and services is not directly liable for a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 unless it “initiates” a call, but may be held “vicariously liable” under federal common law agency principles for a violation of the act by a third-party telemarketer, the Federal Communications Commission has ruled (Joint Petition Filed by DISH Network, LLC, et al. for Declaratory Ruling Concerning the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Rules, FCC, FCC 13-54, 05/09/13).
The decision addresses three petitions for declaratory ruling on issues concerning the Telephone Consumer Protection Act that have arisen in two ongoing federal court lawsuits, Charvat v. EchoStar Satellite, LLC, S.D. Ohio, No. 2:07-cv-01000-JDH-MRA, 2010 WL 5392875, and United States, et al. v. Dish Network, LLC, C.D. Ill., No. 3:09-cv-03073; http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/United_States_of_America_et_al_v_Dish_Network_LLC_Docket_No_309cv/5. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit had ruled that the matter should be referred to the FCC under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction (Charvat v. EchoStar Satellite, LLC, 6th Cir., No. 09-4525, 12/30/10).
In the first of the two cases, Charvat, a consumer named Philip Charvat sued EchoStar Satellite LLC in 2007 (the satellite television service operations now provided by Dish Network Corp.) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio claiming that telemarketers for EchoStar had called his home 30 times in violation of the TCPA--27 prerecorded, and three by live operators. According to the suit, Charvat's requests to be placed on the callers' do-not-call list, however, went unheeded.
In U.S. v. Dish, the United States--on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission and the attorneys general of California, Illinois, North Carolina, and Ohio--sued Dish in 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois seeking damages and injunctive relief for alleged violations of both federal and state telemarketing laws. Among other things, the government contends that DISH, through its authorized dealers, had made unlawful prerecorded calls and live calls to telephone numbers on the national do-not-call registry.
In February 2011, Dish, the U.S. government, and the states of California, Illinois, North Carolina, and Ohio filed a joint petition seeking an FCC ruling on the prerecorded and do-not-call provisions of the TCPA and the commission's implementing regulations to determine whether they create liability for a seller, such as Dish, as a result of unlawful telemarketing calls made by the seller's third-party retailers.
The agency's decision centers on an interpretation of two provisions of the TCPA in particular--sections 227(b) and 227(c), which address prerecorded telemarketing calls and consumers' privacy rights.
“Under our current rules and administrative precedent interpreting and implementing sections 227(b) and 227(c), we do not think that an action taken for the benefit of a seller by a third-party retailer, without more, is sufficient to trigger the liability of a seller under section either section 227(c) or section 227(b),” the agency wrote. “However, we see no reason that a seller should not be liable under those provisions for calls made by a third-party telemarketer when it has authorized that telemarketer to market its goods or services. In that circumstance, the seller has the ability, through its authorization, to oversee the conduct of its telemarketers, even if that power to supervise is unexercised.”
In a statement dissenting in part from the decision, Republican FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai said that while he agrees with the general findings, he has reservations about how the majority defined the scope of third-party liability.
“I find implausible as a matter of statutory construction the declaratory ruling's insistence on one and only one standard of third-party liability for both prerecorded call violations (governed by section 227(b)) and do-not-call violations (governed by section 227(c)),” Pai wrote.
“Although administratively convenient, this one-size-fits-all approach gives short shrift to the divergent language of these two provisions. I believe instead that sections 227(b) and 227(c) embrace different approaches to third-party liability. Under section 227(b), sellers should be held vicariously liable under federal common-law agency principles for TCPA violations committed by third-party telemarketers. By contrast, under section 227(c), third-party liability exists whenever a telemarketer initiates a call on a seller's behalf, even if that telemarketer is not under the seller's control.”
The order was adopted April 17, but not released until May 9.
For the text of the FCC order, visit http://www.fcc.gov/document/dish-network-et-al-petition-declaratory-ruling-re-tcpa-rules.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)