The Telecommunications Law Resource Center is the most comprehensive reference and news platform for communications law, covering broadcasting, cable, broadband, telephony and wireless;...
By Kyle Daly
Aug. 11 — The Federal Communications Commission voted Aug. 10 to approve media ownership rules that leave largely intact current ownership limits, including a ban on owning both a daily newspaper and a broadcast station serving the same geographical market.
Congressional Republicans and representatives of the broadcast and print media industries maintain that the limits are outdated and ill-suited to an era in which broadcasters and newspapers have to compete with the internet for consumers' attention, which presents an increasingly difficult challenge for newspapers in particular. Democrats in Congress and public interest groups say ownership limits are vital to protecting local and diverse voices from being quashed.
FCC spokesman Neil Grace confirmed to Bloomberg BNA that the vote by the full five-member agency was triggered after its three Democrats approved the rules last month (2016 TLN 16, 8/1/16). Grace declined to indicate how the commissioners voted, although Republicans have historically been critical of existing rules. Republican Commissioner Ajit Pai said in a June statement, after FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler circulated the proposal, that it “reflects the world that existed in the 1970s.”
According to a fact sheet issued by the FCC when Wheeler first floated the proposal, the agency maintains the ban on cross-ownership of a newspaper and broadcast station if the station’s broadcast range encompasses the newspaper’s city of publication. An exception is made for failing media properties that would go out of business without cross-ownership. The FCC also readopted a limit on sharing agreements between broadcast stations that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated because the FCC hadn't completed a congressionally mandated quadrennial review of its media ownership rules. If adopted, the order will resolve the quadrennial review of the FCC's ownership rules.
The vote drew strong criticism from leading broadcast and newspaper industry groups, which have argued that loosening ownership rules would help the ailing print media industry. National Association of Broadcasters Vice President of Communications Dennis Wharton said in a statement that the group “strongly disagrees with the FCC’s decision to cling to long-outdated media ownership rules that no longer serve their purpose.” He warned that the order, the NAB believes, will “hasten the great decline of our nation's newspapers.”
Newspaper Association of America CEO David Chavern said in his own statement that the rules were “deeply disappointing.” He called the cross-ownership exception for struggling newspapers “a `too little, too late' recipe that will never be pursued given the low barrier entry for news on digital and mobile platforms” that broadcasters could invest in instead.
In a joint statement, Reps. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Greg Walden (R-Ore.), chairman of the panel's Communications and Technology subcommittee, called the move a “weak attempt to fulfill [the FCC's] mandate,” saying they expect the courts to intervene to prompt more reform of media ownership rules. Upton and Walden have led congressional Republicans as critics of the FCC. Congress has pushed back against the sharing agreement limits by using spending legislation to grandfather in existing joint sales agreements, under which one broadcast station can sell advertising on behalf of another, through 2025 (2016 TLN 6, 6/1/16).
To contact the reporter on this story: Kyle Daly in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Tim McElgunn at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)