Keep up with the latest developments and legal issues in the telecommunications and emerging technology sectors, with exclusive access to a comprehensive collection of telecommunications law news,...
By Tim McElgunn
Oct. 4 — Republican FCC commissioner Michael O'Rielly took to the FCC blog Oct. 4 to detail his disagreements with Chairman Tom Wheeler's plan to open the pay-TV set-top box market to competition.
Wheeler has been pushing his proposal for months amid opposition from the cable and content industries and bipartisan misgivings at the agency and on Capitol Hill. Wheeler's best shot at garnering a majority of votes on the five-member commission is to secure the backing of both of his fellow Democrats, Mignon Clyburn and Jessica Rosenworcel. Rosenworcel has voiced reservations about the proposal. Wheeler faces staunch resistance from O'Rielly and fellow Republican commissioner Ajit Pai.
O'Rielly listed five areas that he sees as particularly problematic for the commission's push to craft new rules aimed at opening the set-top box market to third party equipment vendors and application developers. O'Rielly said the commission's efforts so far are “another perfect case in point for why the commission should make every open meeting item available to the public.”
Wheeler cancelled a scheduled Sept. 29 vote on the proposal, but said he intends to hold a vote by the end of the year and does not intend to open up a fresh public comment period that would further delay commission action.
O'Rielly advocates removing any role for the FCC in overseeing licensing terms and conditions.
“Beyond the commission having no authority or expertise in this area, such interference could undo important protections enacted in those commercial agreements,” O'Rielly wrote.
Wheeler has already stepped back from his original proposal that the FCC review and sign off on all licensing agreements between pay-TV companies and application developers, but, O'Rielly said, “preserving any role for the commission is highly objectionable.”
O'Rielly also objects to forcing multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs)—cable companies, satellite TV providers and telecoms offering TV services—to share data that would be needed to enable universal search across both MVPD-provided programming and content delivered as streams via the internet. He said that the commission's plan mandates sharing “metadata” only by MVPDs and asked, “To the extent universal search proves important to some consumers, why would the commission discriminate in favor of third party app providers?”
He questioned how many applications MVPDs would be required to develop and support, calling for an undefined “safe harbor for particular widely adopted and available consumer apps.” He also warned against forcing pay-TV providers to share revenue with app developers or app stores, calling it an “App Tax.”
Finally he said, MVPDs should not be required to provide their apps to any third party that includes pirated content in its search results, warning that giving consumers easy access to pirated content “will further degrade the video marketplace.”
Wheeler has invoked agency rules against outside contacts on the topic as the commission continues work. Those restrictions are typically in place only for the seven days preceding a vote and lifted when an item is removed from a meeting agenda. On Oct. 2, a coalition of 19 civil rights groups petitioned the commission to lift the restrictions and allow public comment on the revised proposal before the commission votes on it.
To contact the reporter on this story: Tim McElgunn in Cherry Hill, NJ at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Keith Perine at email@example.com
O'Rielly's blog post is available at http://src.bna.com/i8A.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)