The Federal Election Commission could remedy a long-running enforcement case at no cost simply by releasing information already known to the agency about who funded a now-defunct conservative nonprofit group, the liberal watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics is Washington (CREW) argued in recently filed court papers ( CREW v. FEC, D.C. Cir. No. 17-5049, order 5/18/17).
CREW is pursuing a case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, seeking disclosure of funding for the nonprofit Commission on Hope, Growth and Opportunity. The mysterious entity, known as CHGO, spent millions of dollars from an undisclosed donor or donors on ads opposing House Democrats in the 2010 elections. CHGO then ceased operating after the election and the FEC began investigating it.
The appeals court May 18 ordered a briefing schedule for the case, calling for all written briefs to be submitted by Aug. 10. The D.C. Circuit hasn’t yet named the three-judge panel that will consider the case nor scheduled oral argument.
An administrative enforcement complaint was filed by CREW with the FEC charging that CHGO illegally failed to report its donors or spending despite sponsoring about $4 million worth of TV ads attacking Democrats in the 2010 campaign. CHGO and other outside spending groups helped Republicans take control of the House that year. Democrats and liberal watchdog groups alleged that a number of these groups illegally kept their donors secret.
The enforcement complaint against CHGO was dismissed on a deadlocked 3-3 vote of the FEC commissioners. The three Republican commissioners argued the case should be dropped because the spending group has ceased operating and that it would be too costly and would risk extended litigation if the identity of the CHGO’s funders are released now.
A federal district court found the FEC was within its prerogative to dismiss the enforcement matter based on a desire to preserve resources and avoid further litigation. The appeals court should reverse that ruling, CREW argued in a court filing with the appeals court last month, because the FEC Republicans’ concerns about cost and litigation risk are misplaced.
The FEC is able to remedy the violation of disclosure rules now, at no cost, because it has already uncovered in an investigation the information about CHGO’s funders sought in the court challenge, CREW said.
The FEC has acknowledged that its investigation found out who funded CHGO, but the agency has refused to release this information. A request for the identity of conservative group’s funders filed by Bloomberg BNA under the Freedom of Information Act recently was denied by the FEC, citing privacy concerns.
The judge who first considered CREW’s court challenge, Rudolph Contreras of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, said in a ruling earlier this year that he wouldn’t reverse the FEC’s dismissal. Although the FEC had “strong grounds to prosecute” CHGO for campaign finance violations, the judge said, the agency also had the discretion to drop the case because it dragged on for so long that a statute of limitations had lapsed and the nonprofit group had ceased operating.
The judge acknowledged that the FEC’s investigation had uncovered information about the contributors who provided funding for CHGO’s political ads. But, Contreras said, the FEC could face a legal challenge if it released this information.
CHGO’s case was one of several in which FEC critics have challenged the agency’s inaction against non-disclosing groups spending what they term “dark money” in recent elections. The FEC has deadlocked in many of these cases, with the three commissioners holding Democratic seats voting to pursue enforcement action and the three Republican commissioners voting to drop the cases.
To contact the reporter on this story: Kenneth P. Doyle in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Paul Hendrie at pHendrie@bna.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)