This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
Now that a new political leader has been installed at the Labor Department’s contractor auditing office, business representatives and civil rights advocates have a number of items on their wishlists they’d like to see fulfilled by the agency moving forward.
Ondray T. Harris earlier this week began serving as director of the DOL’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, which audits about 1 percent to 2 percent of roughly 200,000 federal contractor facilities annually for workplace affirmative action and nondiscrimination compliance.
With Harris now in place, any plans to change the agency’s enforcement priorities and policies can begin, but it may take some time for those to take shape. In the meantime, federal contractors would like to see more nationwide consistency in the way the OFCCP conducts audits, as well as more collaboration and transparency during those reviews, management lawyers and consultants told Bloomberg Law.
“I think they would like to see a little bit more transparency, cooperation, and a less adversarial approach to investigations,” said James Plunkett, senior government relations counsel at Ogletree Deakins in Washington.
Employee advocates, on the other hand, would like the agency to continue to target systemic discrimination, with a focus on pay equity, and for the administration to show its support for the office’s mission to protect workers, a former OFCCP official and Labor Department attorney said.
“Equal employment opportunity is still the law of the land,” said Shirley Wilcher, the agency’s director during the Clinton administration and now executive director of the American Association for Access, Equity and Diversity in Washington. “It is our hope that it will remain the focus.”
It can be easy to get lost in the weeds over contractor wishes for changes to particular agency policies, such as the rescission of certain internal directives or the return to previous audit approaches, the attorneys and consultants said. For example, contractor representatives have frequently criticized the agency’s deep dives into contractor data and records during the Obama administration. They’ve also repeatedly called for the rescission of a 2013 directive on pay discrimination investigations, which was later generally codified in final rules updating the office’s regulations prohibiting sex discrimination.
Different industries will also have different wishes. Contractors in the health-care industry, for instance, will likely keep an eye on the agency as an enforcement moratorium for certain medical providers expires in 2019. Colleges and universities with federal contracts would like to see more guidance from the agency tailored specifically to the higher-education community, such as whether student-employees should be included in affirmative actions plans.
Some employer organizations have already sent specific recommendations to the agency, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Institute for Workplace Equality.
But more broadly, management-side representatives said they would like more transparency in how the office analyzes contractors’ employment data, especially pay data, and why it requests certain records during audits.
A lack of transparency isn’t helpful for contractors that want to self-audit themselves and look for potential problem areas, said Michael Eastman, vice president of policy and assistant general counsel of the Center for Workplace Compliance in Washington.
Additionally, audit consistency among enforcement regions and more collaboration from the agency during audits were oft-cited wishes from contractors.
“The OFCCP’s interpretation of the regulations and intensity of its reviews often seem as unpredictable as the weather, depending on which regional or district office a contractor is dealing with,” said K. Joy Chin, a management attorney with Jackson Lewis in Melville, N.Y., and co-leader of the firm’s affirmative action compliance and OFCCP defense practice group. “If contractors could see more consistency in the OFCCP’s approach and enforcement, compliance reviews may run more efficiently.”
As for collaboration, contractors would like to see more reasonable deadlines for submitting requested data and documents during audits, as well as more communication, multiple representatives said.
“We wish, when the OFCCP reaches preliminary findings of fact or conclusions, that they engage in a productive dialogue with the contractor and its representatives so that everyone is operating on the same page,” said Alissa Horvitz, a management attorney with Roffman Horvitz in McLean, Va. Horvitz previously served as co-chair of Littler Mendelson’s OFCCP practice group.
Other wishes from the contractor community include:
In light of the Justice Department’s investigation of Harvard University’s affirmative action policies, worker advocates said their wishlist would include a showing of support from DOL leadership to advance the agency’s affirmative action and nondiscrimination goals.
“It would be great for the secretary to demonstrate a clear commitment to the mission of OFCCP,” said Adam Pulver, a former DOL lawyer who’s now an attorney with Public Citizen Litigation Group in Washington.
Both Pulver and Wilcher said they would like to see the agency continue to identify and combat systemic compensation discrimination. The Obama administration made pay equity one of the agency’s top enforcement priorities.
“There are still issues of unequal pay,” Wilcher said. “The agency still needs to make that a priority in my humble opinion.”
Other wishes from employee advocates include:
To contact the reporter on this story: Jay-Anne B. Casuga in Washington at jcasuga@bloomberglaw.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Terence Hyland at thyland@bloomberglaw.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to books@bna.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to research@bna.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)