Pension & Benefits Daily™ covers all major legislative, regulatory, legal, and industry developments in the area of employee benefits every business day, focusing on actions by Congress,...
The Labor Department Aug. 30 officially proposed delaying the fiduciary rule’s exemptions until mid-2019.
The proposed 18-month delay of key provisions of the best-interest-contract and principal-transactions exemptions is necessary because the DOL has yet to complete the presidentially mandated review of the rule. The DOL also anticipates proposing a new “streamlined” class exemption based around recent innovations in the financial services industry, the department said. Because any revisions or changes to the rule and the finalization of the new class exemption can’t realistically be implemented by Jan. 1, the agency believes a longer delay is appropriate.
The delay is a boon for the rule’s detractors, who have been seeking changes to it for some time. Many had hoped for a full repeal of the rule, but chipping away at the best-interest-contract exemption that was called the “heart” of the rule by former Labor Secretary Thomas Perez would be a huge win.
The agency said in court documents Aug. 9 that it would propose the 18-month delay of portions of the rule, including the best-interest-contract exemption, that were set to take effect Jan. 1.
The Obama-era fiduciary rule requires that financial advisers act in their clients’ best interest when giving retirement investment advice. The Trump administration has now delayed portions of the rule on several occasions. Parts of the rule that the DOL called the “least controversial” went into effect June 9. The rule is under review by the agency.
The department also said on Aug. 30 that it won’t enforce a provision of the fiduciary rule aimed at making it easier for investors to bring class actions against financial advisers.
The provision, which prohibits class action waivers in contracts with investors, is part of the best-interest-contract exemption. If advisers and financial institutions want to rely on this exemption now, they only have to comply with the impartial conduct standards. These standards generally require advisers to give advice in their client’s best interest, receive only reasonable compensation, and avoid making misleading statements.
The Obama administration, which issued the fiduciary rule, knew there was always a possibility the exemption’s arbitration provision could go away, Erin M. Sweeney, an employee benefits attorney and of counsel with Miller & Chevalier in Washington, told Bloomberg BNA. Thus, they took steps to insulate it from the rest of the exemption so if a court found it to be unenforceable, the entire exemption wouldn’t “implode,” she said.
The rest of the best-interest-contract exemption’s provisions that could be delayed until mid-2019 include the requirement that financial institutions enter into an enforceable contract with owners of individual retirement accounts. The contract would include a written promise to adhere to the impartial conduct standards, an acknowledgment of fiduciary status, and other required disclosures.
The other exemption that could get pushed to 2019 is the principal-transactions exemption. This exemption allows fiduciaries to sell products from their own financial institution’s inventory to retirement plans and IRAs, if certain requirements are met. As with the best-interest-contract exemption, those who wish to rely on the principal-transactions exemption currently only need to comply with the impartial conduct standards. This exemption also has contract requirements that mirror those in the best-interest-contract exemption.
The proposed delay isn’t a surprise. The Trump administration has been open about its intentions to delay for some time. Timothy D. Hauser, deputy assistant secretary for program operations at the DOL’s Employee Benefits Security Administration, said earlier this year that even the possibility of further changes to the rule would warrant a change in the Jan. 1 applicability date.
If these exemptions are pushed back, there isn’t a guarantee that advisers will comply “with the protections of the rule and there is no way to hold them accountable if they don’t,” Micah Hauptman, financial services counsel at the Consumer Federation of America, told Bloomberg BNA. CFA is a supporter of the rule.
Hauptman said his group is reviewing all of their options regarding the delay, including legal action, but something like that probably wouldn’t come until much later. “My initial view is that it might make sense to hold our fire until they predictably gut the rule and then challenge them on that front,” he said.
The DOL estimates that investor losses associated with the delay will be “relatively small,” which is a change from the agency’s previous cost estimates. When the DOL proposed delaying the fiduciary rule earlier this year for 60 days, the estimate was that it would cost retirement investors $147 million.
This turnaround is “fascinating,” Sweeney said. The rule was issued because it was seen as a benefit to investors, she said.
The DOL attributes the small investor losses to the fact that the fiduciary rule and the impartial conduct standards are in effect.
This assumption is problematic because the DOL assumes “there’s going to be substantial, if not full compliance with the impartial conduct standards,” Hauptman said. Without an effective enforcement mechanism in place, such as the best-interest-contract exemption, there’s no way to ensure compliance, he said.
Those wishing to throw in their two cents this time around don’t have much time. The deadline for comments is 15 days after publication in the Aug. 31 Federal Register.
To contact the reporter on this story: Kristen Ricaurte Knebel in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jo-el J. Meyer at firstname.lastname@example.org
Text of the proposed delay is at http://src.bna.com/r7B.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)