From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
Illinois truck drivers who claim they were misclassified and underpaid by an auto transporter must address their arguments to an arbitrator rather than a judge, a federal district court ruled.
The ruling shows that workers who want to challenge agreements that classify them as independent contractors should be prepared for a detour through arbitration before they can get a day in court.
Drivers signed arbitration agreements with Vehi-Ship LLC that covered their wage claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Illinois Minimum Wage Law. The drivers dispute the scope of the agreements and whether they’re even enforceable, but Judge Edmond E. Chang of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois said Nov. 27 an arbitrator should be the first to consider those issues ( Ali v. Vehi-Ship, LLC , N.D. Ill., No. 17-cv-2688, 11/27/17 ).
The drivers argued Vehi-Ship’s standard agreement contains a waiver of class and collective actions that is invalid under the National Labor Relations Act. Chang said that didn’t make the entire arbitration provision unenforceable in a case brought by six individuals who weren’t requesting class relief.
Rashida Ali and five other drivers filed the lawsuit, alleging they were misclassified as independent contractors and denied minimum wages and overtime payments due under federal law. They also claimed Vehi-Ship made deductions from their wages in violation of an Illinois statute.
The company asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the drivers signed standard agreements to arbitrate any claim “arising out of” the agreement. The agreements provided for arbitrations in Texas under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association.
Chang said the principal issue before him was whether the court should resolve the “gateway” issue of whether the dispute belonged in arbitration. Generally, he said, courts decide such issues, but “the AAA Rules,” which were incorporated into the drivers’ contracts, “could not be clearer about the power of the arbitrator to decide gateway arbitrability issues.”
The drivers argued the arbitration agreement is invalid because the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held in 2016 that when such agreements contain waivers of the right to participate in class or collective actions or proceedings, they run afoul of the NLRA’s guarantee that employees may join together in concerted activity for their mutual aid or protection.
Chang said the Vehi-Ship drivers’ argument “presumes they are entitled to the raft of statutory protections that comes with employment,” but there is an unresolved dispute about whether the drivers are independent contractors, in which case they would have no NLRA protections. “The arbitrator must decide whether a dispute about the parties’ work relationship falls within the scope of the arbitration clause,” Chang wrote.
The court also said that a “savings clause” in the driver agreements could mean that even if the driver contracts contain an invalid provision concerning class action rights, the six drivers would still be bound as individuals to arbitrate their wage and hour claims against Vehi-Ship.
An attorney for the employees declined to comment on the ruling. Counsel for Vehi-Ship didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
O’Connor O’Connor P.C. in Elmhurst, Ill., represented the drivers. Kurt E. Vragel Jr. P.C. in Glenview, Ill., represented Vehi-Ship LLC.
To contact the reporter on this story: Lawrence E. Dubé in Washington, D.C. at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Terence Hyland at email@example.com
Text of the opinion is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/Ali_et_al_v_VehiShip_LLC_Docket_No_117cv02688_ND_Ill_Apr_10_2017_?doc_id=X1Q6NU4NP982.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)