Sept. 28 — A potential national charter for financial technology companies could impose untested new regulations for community investment on marketplace lenders and other nonbank companies.
The regulations would be akin to the requirements placed on banks by the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). That law is limited to depository institutions — but the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), a bank regulator that is considering creating fintech charters, said the law's principles of providing credit and other services to low- and moderate-income communities could be extended beyond banks.
“The OCC has the ability to condition approvals (of nonbank charters) to require compliance and activities consistent with laws like the CRA,” an agency spokesperson told Bloomberg BNA.
That could deter marketplace lenders from seeking a charter, Andrew Lorentz, a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine, in Washington, told Bloomberg BNA.
“Nobody's going to want to go near it if CRA is a consequence,” he said.
The OCC has not said what nonbank charters would require, or even if it will grant them; a decision is expected by the end of year. Some online lenders, though, are untroubled by the prospect of facing CRA-like rules.
“My reaction is, I think that sounds pretty great,” Kathryn Petralia, a co-founder and head of operations for Kabbage, told Bloomberg BNA. “It's obviously important to continue to invest in communities, particularly communities that have less access to financial products.”
Kabbage is an online balance-sheet lender that focuses on loans to small businesses. Like other online small-business lenders, Kabbage touts its ability to make loans to borrowers who aren't served by banks, in part because the online operators apply computerized underwriting algorithms that look beyond the business owner's FICO score.
That should make it easy for Kabbage to meet any reinvestment obligations, Petralia said. An OCC charter, she said, would benefit Kabbage because the charter would pre-empt the patchwork of state laws governing lenders.
The CRA is designed to encourage banks to make loans and investments and provide retail services in the communities where they operate, and particularly in low- and moderate-income communities. It was passed in reaction to the practice called redlining, under which banks refused to issue home mortgages or provide other services in poor neighborhoods, even as they accepted deposits from residents of those neighborhoods.
“In America, if you're a bank, you can't just decide you're going to loan only to the rich,” president John Taylor, president and CEO of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC), a Washington nonprofit with goals similar to those of the CRA, told Bloomberg BNA.
The law does not establish specific quotas or benchmarks for banks to meet, and regulators are charged with protecting the “safety and soundness” of the institutions they oversee. But a CRA review is part of their supervision, and if a bank fails to pass muster, it can be barred from mergers and acquisitions and from opening or closing branches.
The CRA also provides leverage to community groups, who can file letters of comment on a bank's record of compliance. The NCRC reached an agreement in March with KeyBank on a $16.5 billion community development plan and in May with Huntington Banchares Inc. on a $16.1 billion plan, each over five years.
“We definitely support including CRA-like requirements if the OCC decides to grant fintechs a charter,” Dory Rand, president of the Woodstock Institute, a Chicago nonprofit that promotes economic security for low-income and minority communities, told Bloomberg BNA.
“For the fintechs, obviously they don’t provide the same range of services as banks, but if they're doing lending, they can also do investments that benefit communities,” Rand said. “The OCC could tailor its requirements to the type of institution it is and the type of products it offers.”
A key factor in applying the CRA to a conventional bank is defining the community it serves, which is typically a function of where the bank operates brick-and-mortar branches. For internet banks with no branches, regulators have approved “strategic plans” for CRA compliance, with the banks proposing geographic coverage areas they will address.
The OCC would need to make a similar adjustments for online lenders if it grants them charters, Taylor said.
“Wherever those millennials are sitting with a bunch of computers, that’s where their CRA area is if the CRA applies to them, which is ridiculous,” he said. “It's time for the regulators to modernize, to have the evaluative system under CRA to mirror how the industry operates.”
A bigger issue may be the legal basis for the OCC's extension of the CRA to a nonbank, Richard Eckman, a partner with Pepper Hamilton LLC in Wilmington, Del., told Bloomberg BNA.
“It seems like a stretch,” Eckman said. “It's certainly new public policy. It's certainly not something that Congress has ever dealt with.
“I suppose you are getting a government benefit and it comes at a cost,” Eckman said. “And that cost is, to be blunt about it, you have to provide low-cost loans or make investments in your local community: One of the costs of getting the charter would be that requirement. Whether they have the authority to do that, I think, is an interesting question.”
Another question, Eckman said, is what the penalty would be for failing to satisfy any CRA-like requirements OCC might specify for fintech companies.
“Are they going to pull your charter because you don't achieve whatever CRA goals they set?” he asked. “That would be pretty harsh.
“If they can pull your charter because some examiner doesn't think you've met your CRA obligations, I'm not sure people are going to risk capital and invest in that business.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Gregory Robert in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mike Ferullo at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)