Rely on Occupational Safety & Health ReporterSM for full news coverage and documentation of federal and state workplace safety and health programs, standards, legislation,...
Oct. 24 — A miner who filed a discrimination complaint against a company that purchased the mine he worked at, but didn’t hire him, is not entitled to temporary reinstatement, a federal appeals court ruled ( CalPortland Co. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm’n , 2016 BL 349638, D.C. Cir., No. 16-01094, 10/20/16 ).
Senior Circuit Judge David Sentelle, writing for the panel, concluded in an Oct. 20 opinion that under Section 105(c)(2) Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, 30 U.S.C § 815(c)(2), Jeffrey Pappas was not eligible for temporary reinstatement at the Oro Grande cement plant in San Bernardino County, Calif.
According to Section 105(c)(2), a miner or “applicant for employment” may file a discrimination complaint, and the the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, upon application of the Secretary, can order the reinstatement of the miner pending a ruling on the complaint.
In 2014, Pappas was working as a miner at the plant, which was owned by Martin Marietta Materials Inc., when he told management about potentially unsafe directions from a supervisor. After they failed to address them, he notified a Mine Safety and Health Administration inspector, who issued violations. Pappas was later fired that year, after which, he filed a discrimination complaint and, pursuant to a Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission settlement, the company reinstated him.
In June 2015, CalPortland Co. Inc., purchased the plant and three other facilities, but the agreement did not include Martin’s labor force. To staff the plant without shutting down the kiln, CalPortland sought and received hiring advice from Martin’s human resources manager, who eventually joined CalPortland. It extended offers to 115 out of 130 applicants but not to Pappas, who was given a severance package, according to the opinion.
Pappas filed his discrimination complaint in December 2015, and the Department of Labor filed an application for temporary reinstatement. An administrative law judge granted the application and the review commission affirmed ( Sec’y of Labor v. CalPortland Co., FMSHRC, No. WEST 2016-156-DM, 2/8/16).
The discrimination complaint is pending.
Sentelle granted CalPortland’s petition for review and vacated the review commission’s decision and order.
He rejected the review commission and Secretary of Labor’s argument that the term “miner” is ambiguous—specifically that Pappas was “was both a ‘miner’ and an ‘applicant for employment’ at the Oro Grande cement plant.”
No language in the statute supports the argument that the reinstatement provision applies to a physical facility rather than an employer, he wrote.
“Applying section 105(c)(2) to the facts of this case, because he had “no prior work history” and “no prior relationship” with CalPortland, we conclude that Pappas was an applicant for employment for purposes of his discrimination complaint against CalPortland,” Sentelle wrote.
Brian P. Lundgren of Davis Grimm Payne & Marra, Seattle, argued for CalPortland.
Edward Waldman of the U.S. Department of Labor, Arlington, Va., argued for the Secretary of Labor and review commission.
To contact the reporter on this story: Lars-Eric Hedberg in Washington, D.C. at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at firstname.lastname@example.org
The opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in CalPortland Co. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm’n is available at http://src.bna.com/jzV.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)