Access practice tools, as well as industry leading news, customizable alerts, dockets, and primary content, including a comprehensive collection of case law, dockets, and regulations. Leverage...
A federal district court erred in certifying a class of authors objecting to the mass scanning of books for the Google Book Search project without first addressing Google's claim of fair use, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled July 1 (Authors Guild Inc. v. Google Inc., 2d Cir., No. 12-3200-cv, 7/1/13).
Vacating the certification of the class without prejudice, the court remanded the matter for proceedings on the fair use question. This decision comes nearly a year after the Second Circuit granted Google leave to seek interlocutory appeal of the certification (157 PTD, 8/15/12).
This is the latest development in a now seven-year-old dispute between copyright holders and Google Inc., triggered when Google announced its agreement with some of the world's most prominent libraries to digitize their entire holdings and to use the resulting database to aid full-text online searches of the books.
The Authors Guild and Google reached an agreement to settle the claims in 2008. However, after objections from third parties, the settlement was amended. In 2011, after comments from numerous sources, including the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected the proposed settlement as not being “fair, adequate, and reasonable” with respect to the rights of the members of the relevant class (57 PTD, 3/24/11).
In late 2012, the district court granted the Authors Guild leave to file a new amended complaint and move for class certification (183 PTD, 9/21/11). Judge Denny Chin determined that the plaintiffs had demonstrated common questions of law and fact sufficient to satisfy the standards set in Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011).
All persons residing in the United States who hold a United States copyright interest in one or more Books reproduced by Google as part of its Library Project, who are either (a) natural persons who are authors of such Books or (b) natural persons, family trusts or sole proprietorships who are heirs, successors in interest or assigns of such authors.
The district court rejected Google's argument that addressing its fair use defense would require individual members' participation to analyze separately for each implicated work the fair use factors involving the nature of the works and the effects of Google's use on the marketability of the works. Google argued that its digitization project would benefit many members of the putative class and thus their interests would not be represented by the plaintiffs.
In a per curiam decision, the court set aside consideration of the argument that the plaintiffs might not be representative, but it stated that this assertion might indeed “carry some force.”
the resolution of Google's fair use defense in the first instance will necessarily inform and perhaps moot our analysis of many class certification issues, including those regarding the commonality of plaintiffs' injuries, the typicality of their claims, and the predominance of common questions of law or fact.
Furthermore, the court said, addressing the fair use question first would not prejudice the interests of the parties. Thus, the court vacated the class certification and remanded the matter for further proceedings.
The appellate panel comprised Judge Pierre N. Leval, Judge José A. Cabranes, and Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr. The court asserted that any further appeals on this matter would be heard by this same tribunal.
Google was represented by Seth P. Waxman of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, Washington, D.C. The Authors Guild was represented by Robert J. LaRocca of Kohn, Swift & Graf, Philadelphia.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)