Access practice tools, as well as industry leading news, customizable alerts, dockets, and primary content, including a comprehensive collection of case law, dockets, and regulations. Leverage...
By Len Bracken and Blake Brittain
Aug. 31 — The Trans-Pacific Partnership should not restrict Congress from enacting a law to expand access to orphan works, a coalition of five interest groups said in a letter to the U.S. Trade Representative Aug. 31.
The coalition—consisting of the Authors Alliance, Creative Commons, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Knowledge Ecology International and New Media Rights—requested that the TPP not restrict Congress from adopting measures allowing greater access to orphan works and lesser penalties for infringement, as suggested in a June 4 report and draft legislation by the Copyright Office.
Although the latest draft of the TPP's intellectual property section—leaked in May by Knowledge Ecology International—doesn't speak specifically to orphan works, the coalition says it requires specific remedies for copyright infringement in ways that previous international agreements have not.
“When people think of copyrights, a lot of people focus on the rights and exceptions to the rights, so a compulsory license or a fair use would be an exception to the right, but you can have an exception to the enforcement of a right in the same way,” James P. Love, director of Knowledge Ecology International, a nongovernmental organization focused on the implications of intellectual property rights on consumer protection, told Bloomberg BNA Aug. 28. “In the U.S., much of the flexibility is written into intellectual property law as an exception to the remedies or the enforcement as opposed to the right itself.”
“What the TPP does is that it changes everything,” Love said. “It actually creates no exceptions for remedies and really ramped up remedies from the WTO agreement, particularly for copyrights—the most aggressive remedies are for copyrights and trademarks, but particularly for copyrights, in the TPP.”
Specifically, provisions in the draft requiring criminal penalties for infringement “on a commercial scale” are “heavy-handed,” and “could go beyond existing U.S. law to treat even noncommercial uses of copyrighted content, including of orphan works, as illegal and criminal,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation said on its website.
“It's a separate approach from creating a compulsory license on the work itself or extending fair use, and it's a big deal legally because you have more flexibility in the Berne Convention and the World Trade Organization to limit the remedies for infringement than you do limiting the rights themselves—the rights are harder to limit than the remedies in the Berne and the WTO,” Love said.
The Copyright Office proposed limitations on remedies for copyright infringement of orphan works in its report and draft legislation, including restrictions on monetary and injunctive relief. The draft legislation also recommends strong limitations on damages for non-commercial use of orphan works—down to zero for libraries and some other institutions.
“It's a complicated piece of legislation that required a lot of consultation between publishers, photographers, writers of music and writers of text—all the people protected by copyright—as well as libraries and the technology companies,” Love said. “That legislation, which took years to craft, is a highly regarded set of proposals.”
“We're able to get both authors' groups and users' groups on the same letter, because we all agree that the TPP should not prevent this type of legislation from moving forward,” Love said. “Not all the groups on the letter think the legislation proposed by the [Copyright Office] is the best way to proceed, but they all agree it's among the feasible ways you can do it—everyone has their first choice, but this may be their second choice, buy they all think it is better than no solution at all.”
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Anandashankar Mazumdar at email@example.com
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)