Bloomberg Law’s combination of innovative analytics, research tools and practical guidance provides you with everything you need to be a successful litigator.
Oct. 13 — Whether a “habitual drunkard” is removable from the United States as a person with “bad moral character” will get the attention of the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which decided to address the issue Oct. 12 ( Ledezma-Cosino v. Lynch , 2016 BL 340048, 9th Cir., No. 12-73289, 10/12/16 ).
The panel opinion held that 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f) violates the equal protection clause.
Alcoholism is a medical classification that “lacks any rational relation” to an alien’s “classification as a person with bad moral character,” it said.
It added that alcoholism is a medical disability that “is undeserving of punishment and should not be held morally offensive.” Some of the government’s contrary arguments are “deplorable, troubling and wholly unacceptable,” it said.
Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas signed the order.
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe represents Ledezma-Cosino. DOJ represents the government.
To contact the reporter on this story: Bernie Pazanowski in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jessie Kokrda Kamens at email@example.com
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)