Stay ahead of developments in federal and state health care law, regulation and transactions with timely, expert news and analysis.
June 23 — Hospital groups recently told the CMS they are concerned with some parts of the fiscal year 2016 inpatient rehabilitation proposed rule.
The Federation of American Hospitals (FAH) expressed concern about data the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services used to construct an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF)-specific marketbasket, the group said in a June 22 letter.
Similarly, the American Medical Rehabilitation Providers Association (AMRPA) asked the CMS in a June 22 letter to make several changes to the data and methodology used for the marketbasket update before implementing it. However, AMRPA said it supports the overall marketbasket policy and commends the agency on its effort.
AMRPA is a trade association that represents more than 500 freestanding rehabilitation hospitals, rehabilitation units of general hospitals and outpatient rehabilitation service providers.
The American Hospital Association also urged the agency to postpone implementation of the new IRF-specific marketbasket until the CMS can ensure it reflects accurate costs for freestanding and hospital-based IRFs, its June 18 letter said.
As part of the payment update, the CMS outlined an IRF-specific marketbasket to replace the Rehabilitation, Psychiatric and Long-Term (RPL) Care marketbasket.
The proposed IRF marketbasket would be based on 2012 data and the RPL marketbasket is based on 2008 data, the agency said. The new marketbasket would be derived using both freestanding and hospital-based IRFs’ FY 2012 Medicare cost report data.
In April, the CMS issued the proposed rule (CMS-1624-P; 80 Fed. Reg. 23,332), which would increase Medicare payments to IRFs by about $130 million in FY 2016, or 1.7 percent. Comments were due June 22.
The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, a congressional advisory panel, May 27 told the CMS that the payment increase is unnecessary.
The proposed IRF-specific marketbasket contains incomplete data on the wages and salary cost weight, the FAH said.
According to the FAH, an analysis by health-care finance consultants firm Dobson | DaVanzo determined omitted data resulted in a 4 percent understatement of the wages and salary cost weight used for the IRF-specific marketbasket.
Moreover, Dobson | DaVanzo found that, in calculating cost weights associated with employee benefits and contract labor for the new IRF marketbasket, more than half the cost reports from both freestanding and hospital-based IRFs that the CMS used contained no data, the FAH said.
“In fact, only sixteen percent of hospital-based units reported contract labor costs,” the FAH said.
“These data deficiencies raise valid concerns about the accuracy of the IRF-specific market basket that CMS has proposed, and must be addressed in the final rule,” the FAH said.
Alternatively, the CMS should consider reverting to the RPL marketbasket until it is confident that the IRF-specific marketbasket reflects reasonably complete and properly applied data, the group told the agency.
AMRPA recommended the agency use the hospital inpatient prospective payment system data as a source for calculating weights for some categories making up the 2012-based IRF-specific marketbasket. It said the agency should use the 2012 data until a significant percentage of all IRF providers submits complete cost reports.
To contact the reporter on this story: Michael D. Williamson in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Janey Cohen at email@example.com
The proposed rule is at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-04-27/pdf/2015-09617.pdf.
The FAH's letter is at http://fah.org/upload/documents/FAH_Comments_on_2016_IRF_Proposed_Rule.pdf.
AMRPA's letter is at http://op.bna.com/hl.nsf/r?Open=mwin-9xrqkj.
The AHA's letter is at http://op.bna.com/hl.nsf/r?Open=mwin-9xrp9n.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)