Keep up with the latest developments and legal issues in the telecommunications and emerging technology sectors, with exclusive access to a comprehensive collection of telecommunications law news,...
Oct. 27 — The non-profit corporation that coordinates the internet domain name system didn’t breach its bylaws or auction rules when it allowed an auction for the .web domain to proceed, according to an Oct. 26 court filing ( Ruby Glen LLC v. Internet Corp. for Assigned Names & Numbers , C.D. Cal., No. 2:16-cv-05505, motion to dismiss filed 10/26/16 ).
After applicant Nu Dotco LLC won .web for $135 million (21 ECLR 30, 8/3/16), VeriSign Inc. announced that it had provided the funds for NuDotco’s bid and plans to acquire the rights to .web. VeriSign, operator of the .com and .net domains, hadn’t applied for .web.
The case creates uncertainty as to whether the results of the auction are final and whether VeriSign will succeed in acquiring .web.
Competing applicant Donuts Inc. sued the non-profit Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers over its failure to properly investigate NuDotCo prior to the auction (21 ECLR 32, 8/17/16). ICANN, in moving to dismiss the claims Oct. 26, also argued that even if the allegations were true, Donuts was bound by a contractual provision not to sue.
“Donuts learned of evidence of this backdoor arrangement after the ICANN auction was scheduled,” Jon Nevett, Donuts co-founder and executive vice president for corporate affairs, told Bloomberg BNA Oct. 27. “The discovery is fully relevant and deserved to be raised no matter when it came to light.”
Domain registry Donuts alleged that prior to the auction it contacted ICANN about a potential change of ownership over Nu Dotco that could disqualify the applicant. After ICANN declined to postpone the auction to investigate, Donuts submitted a request for an independent review process (IRP), a pre-established mechanism to check ICANN actions. The IRP was still pending at the time of the auction.
Donuts said that ICANN breached its promise that it wouldn't proceed with an auction if any active participant has a pending challenge under one of ICANN's mechanisms.
ICANN argued that Donuts misstated the auction rules. The rules provide that all pending accountability mechanisms must be resolved “prior to the scheduling of an auction,” ICANN said. Donuts initiated an IRP request in July, but the auction was scheduled in April, ICANN said.
ICANN also said that Donuts failed to allege that ICANN breached its duties of accountability and transparency, as set out in the corporation's bylaws. Donuts had alleged that ICANN failed to engage in a thorough, open and transparent investigation, but the bylaws require transparency “only to the extent ‘feasible,'” ICANN said. Donuts also failed to cite any bylaws provision requiring ICANN to investigate claims made by one applicant against another, ICANN said.
ICANN argued that Donuts' claims are barred regardless because the .web application contained a “covenant not to sue,” which requires applicants to pursue claims using ICANN's accountability mechanisms rather than in court.
ICANN argued that this provision is valid and fair. “The Covenant Not to Sue has a well-founded business justification, namely to prevent a dispersed flood of court litigation that would threaten to disrupt the orderly operation of the entire New gTLD Program,” ICANN said.
The federal district court assigned to this case previously ruled, in a case over the .africa domain, that “serious questions” existed over the enforceability of the covenant not to sue (21 ECLR 563, 4/20/16). That decision is on appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
To contact the reporter on this story: Alexis Kramer in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Keith Perine at email@example.com
Full text at http://src.bna.com/jGp.
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)