Bloomberg Law: Privacy & Data Security brings you single-source access to the expertise of Bloomberg Law’s privacy and data security editorial team, contributing practitioners,...
By Ali Qassim
LONDON--Ireland's Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC) will not investigate complaints relating to Facebook Ireland Inc.'s and Apple Distribution International's alleged transfer of European Union citizens' data to the U.S. National Security Agency via the NSA's PRISM internet surveillance program, ODPC Senior Compliance Officer Ciara O'Sullivan told BNA July 30.
A Vienna, Austria-based group of student lawyers June 23 filed separate complaints with the ODPC against Apple and Facebook alleging that their participation in the PRISM program violated the EU Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) and Ireland's Data Protection Act 1998.
In a letter dated July 23, O'Sullivan said the DPA had concluded that it would not investigate Apple and Facebook--whose EU headquarters are in Dublin--regarding their alleged participation in the PRISM program because the companies were both participants in the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Program “and as this provides for US law enforcement access, there is nothing to investigate.”
Under the Data Protection Directive, the personal information of EU citizens may be transferred out of the European Economic Area--the 28-member-state EU bloc plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway-- only if the European Commission deems the receiving country's data protection regime to be “adequate.”
The Commission granted adequacy status to the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Program in 2000. Under the program, U.S. companies self-certify to the Commerce Department that they will abide by EU data protection principles.
O'Sullivan highlighted the Safe Harbor Program's provision for access by U.S. law enforcement authorities and a provision in Section 11(2) of the Data Protection Act that allows transfers consistent with approvals by the European Commission.
A recital in the Commission's U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Program approval decision allows, however, for review of the program “in the light of reports on implementation by enforcement authorities involved,“ O'Sullivan said.
In a July 25 statement, Max Schrems, the spokesman for the Austria-based lawyers, took issue with the ODPC's decision. He highlighted the difference between the decision and the response of German DPAs to revelations about the PRISM program, in which they announced a crackdown on privacy violations involving countries outside the European Union and called for the German government to suspend participation in the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Program (12 PVLR 1329, 7/29/13).
“The different reaction in the member states shows that European fundamental rights are not worth the paper they are written on, if your opponent is headquartered in the right country,” Schrems said in the statement.
He suggested that since Ireland has failed to provide redress over PRISM, the complaints should fall within the jurisdiction of the European Court for Human Rights to answer “whether Ireland has adequately protected our right to privacy by allowing Europeans' data to be forwarded to a foreign spy agency in bulk.”
After a June 14 U.S.-EU Justice Ministerial meeting in Dublin, European Commission Vice-President Viviane Reding announced that U.S. and EU officials would be meeting to discuss data protection issues related to PRISM (12 PVLR 1049, 6/17/13).
O'Sullivan told BNA that the ODPC welcomed high level discussions between EU and U.S. officials over “the proportionality and oversight arrangements for programs such as PRISM.”
A redacted version of the Irish DPA's response letter to complaints about Facebook and Apple, as posted by the advocacy group student group Europe v. Facebook, is available at http://www.europe-v-facebook.org/Response_23_7_2013.pdf.
Europe v. Facebook's complaint against Facebook is available at http://www.europe-v-facebook.org/prism/facebook.pdf.
Europe v. Facebook's redacted complaint against Apple is available at http://www.europe-v-facebook.org/prism/apple.pdf.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)