For over 50 years, Bloomberg Tax’s renowned flagship daily news service, Daily Tax Report® has helped leading practitioners and policymakers stay on the cutting edge of taxation and...
Sept. 23 — Final rules on grants by private foundations to foreign entities added a number of helpful clarifications, including the years in which an opinion on an equivalency determination may be relied upon.
“Previously there was some question about how long you could rely on an opinion from a lawyer, certified public accountant or enrolled agent, and the final rules clarify that the person writing the opinion is to use five years of public support information, which is typically the five most recently completed tax years, and that the opinion is then valid for two years,” Robert Wexler, principal with Adler & Colvin, told Bloomberg BNA Sept. 23.
Typically professionals will look at the five most recently completed tax years of the foreign grantee, he said. That means if they are writing an opinion in 2015, they will look at the grantee's gross revenues from 2014 back to 2010 to determine whether the grantee is publicly supported, in order to write the opinion.
The rules (T.D. 9740; RIN1545-BL23) are aimed at helping foundations determine if the foreign charities to which they are making grants are the equivalent of U.S. public charities.
Current regulations allow private foundations to treat such grants as charitable donations if they made a “good faith” equivalency determination, either using an affidavit from the donee organization or a legal opinion showing that the recipient group was like a U.S. public charity.
The final rules also help to clarify how a foundation can rely on another organization's legal or professional adviser for an opinion of equivalency and gave implicit validity to repositories, Wexler said. In addition, they said that private foundations can't rely on opinions from foreign lawyers.
CoF Wins Big on Repositories
For the Council on Foundations, the rules were all about the sanctioning of repositories for equivalency determinations.
“These final regulations will allow foundations to confidently rely on equivalency determinations provided through shared repositories like NGOsource,” Vikki Spruill, president and chief executive officer of the Council on Foundations, told Bloomberg BNA in a Sept. 23 statement.
The Council on Foundations had advocated for this outcome for many years, in an effort to reduce barriers to global grant-making for foundations, she said.
In 2013, the Council on Foundations and TechSoup Global launched the first equivalency determination repository, NGOsource, after interpreting the proposed rules as paving the way for the repositories, Spruill said.
A repository stores past equivalency determinations conducted on foreign organizations for future use. It provides advice to the private foundation that the grantee qualifies and lists the foreign charities that are eligible to receive grants without the need for a private foundation to do “expenditure responsibility,” which involves due diligence, paperwork, monitoring and reporting.
A U.S. private foundation can make grants to a foreign organization for charitable purposes, but if the foreign charity qualifies as the foreign equivalent of a U.S. public charity then the U.S. private foundation can avoid expenditure responsibility.
The one drawback in the rules is that foundations can't solely rely on an affidavit of equivalency that a grantee has prepared, Wexler said.
One of the most common practices was for a foundation to get a particular type of affidavit from a grantee that they signed under oath. The affidavit would describe how the organization had complied with the U.S. tax code Section 501(c)(3) rules and also give a public support schedule, if the organization was publicly supported.
“Lots of people don't have in-house counsel and not everyone wants to pay a lawyer to write an opinion,” Wexler said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Diane Freda in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Brett Ferguson at email@example.com
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)