Pension & Benefits Daily™ covers all major legislative, regulatory, legal, and industry developments in the area of employee benefits every business day, focusing on actions by Congress,...
By Jacklyn Wille
Jan. 19 — In the latest installment of a 15-year legal battle, a federal judge ordered Cigna Corp. to change the way it calculated its workers' pension benefits, despite noting that the ruling would cause the company to make some overpayments (Amara v. CIGNA Corp., D. Conn., No. 3:01-cv-02361-JBA, 1/14/16).
The lawsuit—which challenged Cigna's 1998 decision to convert its workers' retirement benefits from a traditional defined benefit pension plan to a cash balance plan—ultimately resulted in a seminal U.S. Supreme Court case on judicial remedies under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, along with a court ruling awarding plan participants increased benefits. In this most recent decision, Judge Janet Bond Arterton of the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Jan. 14 rejected several of Cigna's proposed methods for calculating the pension benefits it owes workers under the previous court rulings in this case.
Arterton acknowledged that her Jan. 14 ruling would “inevitably lead to some overpayment on Cigna's part,” because she barred the company from discounting participants' opening account balances and forced it to use a different offset for Social Security benefits.
However, she said that any ambiguities or close calls in the calculations should be resolved in the participants' favor, because Cigna misrepresented the effects of the pension plan conversion and failed to keep detailed records that would support its calculations.
Despite criticizing several aspects of Cigna's proposed methodology, Arterton nevertheless found that the company wasn't required to make special adjustments for early retirement benefits, survivor's benefits or certain other discrete issues. On that point, Arterton noted that early court orders relieved Cigna of any obligation to provide additional relief for particular class members.
Arterton also rejected the participants' request that Cigna be ordered to create a compliance plan explaining how it will pay the required benefits. According to Arterton, the Cigna defendants “have not yet shown themselves to be noncompliant.”
Finally, Arterton ordered the company to provide records backing up its claim that more than 9,000 of the class members weren't entitled to any relief whatsoever.
The case stemmed from CIGNA's decision to convert its traditional defined benefit pension plan to a cash balance plan in 1998.
A group of participants filed a lawsuit in 2001, and in February 2008, the District of Connecticut determined that Cigna violated ERISA's notice and disclosure requirements when it issued plan communications that failed to explain that participants' benefits would be subject to “wear away” (33 PBD, 2/20/08).
Four months later, the district court fashioned a remedy consisting of all accrued benefits under the defined benefit plan plus all accrued benefits under the cash balance plan—a remedy the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit referred to as “A+B” benefits.
The district court specifically said that the remedies would fall under ERISA Section 502(a)(1)(B), which provides a claim for plan benefits, rather than Section 502(a)(3), which allows appropriate equitable relief to remedy fiduciary breaches (116 PBD, 6/17/08).
The Second Circuit affirmed this ruling without written rationale (192 PBD, 10/7/09).
The Supreme Court reviewed these rulings and unanimously held that ERISA Section 502(a)(1)(B) didn't permit the district court to reform the terms of the Cigna plan. However, it instructed the lower courts to consider whether a similar remedy could be available under Section 502(a)(3) (95 PBD, 5/17/11).
On remand, the district court analyzed the issue under Section 502(a)(3) and ordered Cigna to reform its plan to provide increased benefits (245 PBD, 12/26/12).
The Second Circuit affirmed this order in 2014 . The parties then began litigating over the proper methodology for carrying out the courts' directives.
The participants were represented by Law Offices of Stephen R. Bruce; Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis; Green & Sklarz; and Walsh Woodard. Cigna was represented by Robinson & Cole and Morgan Lewis & Bockius.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jacklyn Wille in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jo-el J. Meyer at firstname.lastname@example.org
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)