Access practice tools, as well as industry leading news, customizable alerts, dockets, and primary content, including a comprehensive collection of case law, dockets, and regulations. Leverage...
Dec. 8 — House Judiciary Committee leaders are to split the Copyright Office from the Library of Congress, as part of an initial policy proposal stemming from a committee review of copyright law.
The committee’s chairman and top Democrat—Reps. Robert W. Goodlatte (R-Va.) and John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) also proposed creating a small claims tribunal within the Copyright Office and an online, searchable database of copyright ownership claims, in a statement released Dec. 8.
Representatives of copyright owners and public interest advocates both expressed hope that the proposal would result in giving the agency the resources to modernize its operations, particularly its IT systems.
However, some public interest advocates worried that legislation might result in removing oversight from the agency and making it vulnerable to lobbyists from large content industries.
Goodlatte and Conyers said they were seeking written comments on the proposal for Copyright Office autonomy. Legislation would granting the Copyright Office “autonomy” with respect to its budget and its technology.
This statement comes two months after the controversial removal of Maria A. Pallante as head of the agency by the new librarian of Congress, Carla D. Hayden.
The lawmakers said their proposal is the first of multiple proposals resulting from the committee’s multi-year review of federal copyright law. They specifically mentioned music licensing as a subject for a future policy release. Goodlatte and Conyers also posted a YouTube video announcing their proposal.
“This is just the beginning of this stage of the copyright review,” Goodlatte said in the video. He promised further proposals on music licensing and other issues in the future.
Conyers asked for input from “interested parties” to help the committee draft legislation addressing the announced policy proposals.
Keith Kupferschmid of the Copyright Alliance, an association that represents creators, said that he believed that Copyright Office modernization was a logical place for the Judiciary Committee to start.
“There’s tremendous support,” Kupferschmid told Bloomberg BNA. “I know copyright issues can be very controversial and get stuck, because there’s so many viewpoints. But modernization of the Copyright Office is not one of those.”
Ryan Clough of public interest advocacy group Public Knowledge said that his organization was in favor of efforts to modernize the Copyright Office and ensure that it has the resources to upgrade its IT systems.
However, he said, he would be concerned if any eventual legislation “freed the register of copyrights from any day-to-day supervision by any other government official.”
Removing the Copyright Office from the Library of Congress entirely would make it vulnerable to influence from content industry lobbyists, according to Aram Sinnreich, a communications professor at American University in Washington, who has written extensively on copyright issues.
“What it really comes down to is as long as the Copyright Office is housed inside the Library of Congress then it is insulated to some degree from lobbyists who seek to erase the public interest dimension of the law,” Sinnreich told Bloomberg BNA.
The proposal specifies that the Copyright Office will remain within the legislative branch. That would preclude options such as merging it with the Patent and Trademark Office or making it an independent commission-run agency such as the Federal Communications Commission.
However, Christine Haight Farley, a law professor at American University, Washington, said that combining the Copyright Office and the PTO would make it “less open to industry capture” while also giving it budgetary and technological resources.
Jonathan Band, a copyright lawyer based in Washington, said that the small claims tribunal part of the proposal is not likely to make much headway.
“I think no one will show up to the party,” Band told Bloomberg BNA. “Congress and the Copyright Office would spend a lot of time and effort crafting legislation, and few, if any, defendants will agree to the tribunal’s jurisdiction. If parties can’t resolve low value disputes amicably, they won’t submit to a small claims tribunal.”
Goodlatte and Conyers also proposed making the register of copyrights subject to “the same nomination and consent process as other senior government officials.” In response, the Library Copyright Alliance urged that the librarian of Congress not wait for congressional action before naming Pallante’s successor.
Currently, the librarian of Congress has complete authority to appoint the register.
Goodlatte and Conyers’s proposal also includes:
The top members of the Senate Judiciary Committee—Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.)—released a statement Dec. 8 supporting the ideas of Copyright Office modernization and independence.
The Library of Congress issued a statement stating that it agreed with the idea of Copyright Office modernization and that it would work with Congress to pursue that goal.
To contact the reporter on this story: Anandashankar Mazumdar in Washington at AMazumdar@bna.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mike Wilczek at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)