From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
By Hassan Kanu
June 7 — A college administrator who alleged he wasn't hired to direct an academic support program focused on minority students because he's white had his race discrimination claims rejected by a federal jury ( Peterson v. Univ. of Florida, N.D. Fla., No. 1:14-cv-00220, jury verdict 6/3/16 ).
Dana Peterson alleged his superiors refused to consider him before hiring a less-qualified black woman, even though he previously headed a substantially similar department. The University of Florida said it didn't select Peterson because he is “grating and difficult” and had a history of making racist comments, according to an earlier opinion in the case by Judge Mark Walker of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida.
According to an employee, Peterson said on one occasion that “black women have babies but black men won't take care of them because most are in jail.” Witnesses reported during a subsequent investigation that Peterson would tell his assistant to stop giving him “BWA,” an acronym he used for “black woman attitude.” The jury found June 3 that an administrator did prevent Peterson from getting the job, but not because he is white.
The case illustrates that a complainant need not “rebut” a defendant's non-discriminatory explanation of an allegedly biased act under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In denying summary judgment to the university, Walker noted that “Peterson need not show that the proffered reasons are false.” Rather, his actual burden was to convince the court “that a jury could reasonably believe his explanation” rather than the university's reasons for the hiring decision.
Peterson previously headed AIM, a race-neutral University of Florida program for freshmen from disadvantaged backgrounds, the court said.
Bernard Mair, a black man, took over AIM in 2009. The university said in its summary judgment motion that co-workers felt Peterson was difficult and that he didn't get along with Mair.
Peterson received a “mostly laudatory” recommendation for a promotion that year but was criticized for “difficulty working constructively” with the Office of Academic Support and Institutional Services, the court said. OASIS “focused its attention on minority students,” Walker wrote.
Later in 2009, an employee complained that Peterson said a provost should “go back to Africon” while simulating a dart gun, the university said. He also admitted using the “N word.”
In 2010, Mair consolidated AIM and OASIS to broaden their scope while maintaining focus on minority students. Peterson felt the merger was a bad idea and made his feelings clear, the court wrote. He alleged that administrators told him the consolidation was spurred by the black alumni association and that he would be perfect for the directorship if he were black.
Peterson noted that the black woman who was selected didn't have academic administration experience. The university countered that her qualifications in other areas compensated for that. She had significant experience counseling women and minorities, served on several “important departmental committees” and won awards for faculty adviser of the year, it said.
Lytle & Barszcz represented Peterson. Greenberg Traurig PA represented the university.
To contact the reporter on this story: Hassan Kanu in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Susan J. McGolrick at email@example.com
Text of the jury verdict is available at http://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/document/PETERSON_v_UNIVERSITY_OF_FLORIDA_et_al_Docket_No_114cv00220_ND_Fl.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)