Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
Past work defending BP PLC after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and personal opposition to the EPA’s climate change efforts would have no bearing on running the Justice Department’s environmental office, President Donald Trump’s nominee said.
Jeffrey Bossert Clark told senators at his June 28 confirmation hearing that, if approved to head the Environment and Natural Resources Division, he would vigorously defend his federal agency clients just as he has defended corporate clients.
“Client agencies are the ones who make policies. I don’t think my personal views are relevant,” Clark said.
During the hearing, Democrats pressed him about his work for corporate clients such as BP, his views on climate change, and his affiliation with the Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies.
Several Democrats on the Judiciary Committee, including Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), grew frustrated with Clark’s evasion and pleaded with the committee’s chairman, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), to force him to answer their queries.
Though he expressed concern with the issue of the Trump administration stonewalling congressional inquiries, Grassley said it wouldn’t be appropriate to demand that Clark talk about his views on environmental issues in this case.
“What Democrats really need to know is these guys are hired to do a job,” Grassley told reporters after the hearing. “They leave their personal views out.”
Grassley also said he expects his committee to cast a vote on Clark’s nomination late next month.
Clark has been at the firm Kirkland & Ellis LLP since 1996, with the exception of a four-year period during the George W. Bush administration when he served in the Justice Department.
While at the department, he was the second-in-command at its environment division, in charge of its appellate work. If confirmed, Clark would be in charge of the entire environment division, which prosecutes civil and criminal environmental violations and also defends the Environmental Protection Agency and others when their actions are challenged in court.
Last year, Clark testified before the House Judiciary Committee in favor of a bill that would have reined in the regulatory authority of federal agencies. The bill, which passed the House but died in the Senate, would have effectively overturned the so-called Chevron doctrine, in which courts defer to agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous laws.
“ Chevron has been a failed experiment,” Clark said at the May 2016 hearing. It has resulted in “too much authority being given to the executive branch.”
When asked about Chevron at his confirmation hearing, however, Clark told the senators, “As we sit here today, Chevron is still good law and I would enforce it.”
Though there were three other nominees being considered at the hearing, the majority of the senators’ questions were directed at Clark.
He came under the most intense questioning from Democrats on the issue of articles he wrote for the Federalist Society’s website on the issue of climate change. In these articles, Clark criticized EPA decisions to classify greenhouse gasses as dangerous pollutants and its reliance on United Nations-backed climate science.
“You have gone beyond role of a lawyer,” Whitehouse told him. “You’ve been a political advocate against climate science.”
Clark responded by pointing to his record at the Justice Department during the Bush administration as an indication that he would defend agencies and enforce environmental laws objectively.
To contact the reporter on this story: David Schultz in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Rachael Daigle at email@example.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)