For the professional edge in your day-to-day practice, rely on the most timely, objective reporting on significant developments, trends, and emerging patterns in criminal law today—Criminal Law...
A driver not listed on the rental agreement may still have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the vehicle, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled May 14.
The justices unanimously rejected the argument that Terrence Byrd couldn’t challenge the search of a rental car he was driving simply because he wasn’t an authorized driver.
The court takes “an expansive reading of the Fourth Amendment, with the conclusion being that the Constitution trumps contractual terms,” Colin Miller, of the University of South Carolina College of Law, Columbia, S.C., told Bloomberg Law in an email. Miller filed an amicus brief in support of Byrd.
The court didn’t lay out the “precise test for when a person has sufficient rights in a rental car to have Fourth Amendment rights,” Kerr told Bloomberg Law in an email. It simply said that being an unauthorized driver, by itself, wasn’t enough to defeat a driver’s Fourth Amendment interest.
The court sent the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to examine the contours of the appropriate test.
That court previously rejected Byrd’s motion to suppress the 49 bricks of heroin and body armor found in the trunk, noting a split existed in the federal courts on whether drivers like Byrd have expectations of privacy in rental vehicles.
The court took what it called a “property-based” look at the Fourth Amendment.
In “the main, ‘one who owns or lawfully possesses or controls property will in all likelihood have a legitimate expectation of privacy by virtue of the right to exclude,’” Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for the court.
There’s “no reason why the expectation of privacy that comes from lawful possession and control” would “differ depending on whether the car in question is rented” by “someone other than the person in current possession of it,” Kennedy said.
The court’s core reasoning seems to be that the ability to challenge a search of “property comes from it being treated as your stuff, and whether your name is on the rental car contract doesn’t seem that important to whether it’s treated as your stuff,” Kerr said on Twitter.
The decision leaves open “the hard line-drawing question as applied to this case,” Kerr said.
The government argued that Byrd procured the rental car by a fraud. He used “a straw renter to allow him to take sole control of a rental car that he would not have been able to rent himself” because of his criminal background, the government said in its brief.
The government likened Byrd to a car thief, whom all parties seemed to agree would not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the car.
But the court was unclear if “law should distinguish between one who obtains a vehicle through subterfuge of the type the Government alleges occurred here and one who steals the car outright.”
That question, at least in the first instance, is for the lower courts, the Supreme Court said.
On remand, the court will presumably look at whether Byrd knew that his criminal record precluded him from renting the car; had someone else rent the car as subterfuge; and whether that was a crime, Miller said.
The case is Byrd v. United States , 2018 BL 169553, U.S., No. 16-1371, 5/14/18 .
To contact the editor responsible for this story: C. Reilly Larson at email@example.com
Copyright © 2018 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)