Daily Labor Report® is the objective resource the nation’s foremost labor and employment professionals read and rely on, providing reliable, analytical coverage of top labor and employment...
Nov. 10 — The U.S. Supreme Court Nov. 10 declined to review a split federal appeals court ruling that a fired Decherd, Tenn., police chief and patrolman each had a property interest in continued employment based on a department policy manual.
In June 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit 2-1 reversed summary judgment to the city on Terry Freeze and Earnest Colvin's 14th Amendment due process claims under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. § 1983).
The majority found that the department policies and procedures manual, which stated that “discipline shall be for cause and follow the basic concepts of due process,” contained “unequivocal” language creating an employment contract between the city and the officers.
The manual also established a property right in continued employment “subject to only termination for good cause,” thus removing the officers from at-will employment status, the majority said.
Petitioning for high court review, the city argued that the justices must resolve a circuit split created by the Sixth Circuit's decision on whether an at-will employee has a property right to continued employment based solely on “a policy of progressive discipline or a policy of discipline for cause” like the one in the current case.
It also contended that the Sixth Circuit's ruling, if left to stand, would impermissibly expand the scope of procedural due process and limit the at-will employment doctrine.
Freeze and Colvin waived their right to respond.
According to the city, the Sixth Circuit majority concluded that a guarantee of “discipline for cause” creates a constitutional right to termination only for cause.
By contrast, it said, the Eighth Circuit in Bennett v. Watters, 260 F.3d 925 (8th Cir. 2001), held that for-cause discipline of a public employee wasn't the same as providing that employee with a right to continued employment.
The city added that the Seventh Circuit in Cromwell v. City of Momence, 713 F.3d 361, 35 IER Cases 621 (7th Cir. 2013), reached a similar determination.
“The conflict between these opinions and the [Sixth Circuit] majority arise from the circuit majority's erroneous conclusion that employment discipline and termination are interchangeable,” the city said. “Petitioner requests that [the Supreme Court] grant a Writ of Certiorari to preserve the distinction between the two under the Due Process Clause.”
Additionally, the city argued that by “conflating employment discipline and termination,” the Sixth Circuit's ruling improperly “limits” the at-will employment doctrine and “creates a due process right where none exists.”
“The circuit majority's holding eliminates at-will employment where an employer creates an expectation of discipline for cause,” it said. “In fact, reliance on this holding may have the effect of shaping a due process right to discipline for cause short of termination, a right this Court has yet to address.”
Ortale, Kelley, Herbert & Crawford represented the city and officials. Kerry E. Knox of Murfreesboro, Tenn., represented Freeze and Colvin.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jay-Anne B. Casuga in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Susan J. McGolrick at firstname.lastname@example.org
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)