From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
The National Labor Relations Board is launching a comprehensive review of its ethics and member recusal rules, the board announced June 8.
“Recent events have raised questions about when Board Members are to be recused from particular cases and the appropriate process for securing such recusals,” NLRB Chairman John Ring said in a statement accompanying the announcement. “We are going to look at how recusal determinations are made to ensure not only that we uphold the Board’s strong ethical culture, but also to ensure each Board Member’s right to participate in cases is protected in the future.”
The move comes as the board looks to resolve conflict-of-interest questions surrounding its decisions in a pair of high-profile cases. Ring told Bloomberg Law June 8 that the review is meant to clarify the situations in which members must recuse themselves from cases and to determine who decides whether recusal is required.
The issue stems from the conclusion of the NLRB’s inspector general and designated ethics officer that Member William Emanuel (R) violated an ethics pledge by participating in one of those cases. The board in a December ruling in Hy-Brand Industrial Contractors scrapped an expansive approach to joint employment established in the 2015 Browning-Ferris Industries case. Emanuel’s former law firm, Littler Mendelson, represents a staffing agency in Browning-Ferris, which is still on appeal.
The December ruling resulted in the case being withdrawn and left intact a key labor policy from the Obama administration: the expansion of “joint employer” liability for associated businesses. The Obama-era rule generally makes it easier to hold one business liable for labor violations committed against workers at a different business, like staffing and contractor companies and franchisees. The board recently announced it will address the joint employer issue via a proposed regulation.
Presidential appointees are obligated to avoid potential or actual conflicts of interests when carrying out their duties. Those obligations stem from federal laws and regulations—as well as executive orders, which are typically referred to as the White House ethics pledge.
The board members and most of the agency attorneys are employment specialists. The board wants to draw on the expertise of government ethics lawyers and other agencies that have also grappled with similar conflicts issues, Ring said.
“We haven’t decided how exactly we’re going to do it,” Ring said. “So everything’s on the table in terms of who we reach out to—if the White House can be helpful, we’ll ask them, if the Office of Government Ethics can be helpful, we’ll ask them.”
The board in the announcement said it would also seek outside guidance, including by reviewing how other independent agencies approach the same issues.
Ring was giving the keynote speech at a labor law conference at the New York University School of Law when the announcement came.
The chairman elaborated on comments he made June 7 about being attracted to the post—which he’s held for about two months—because of President Donald Trump’s economic message.
An attempt to give more consideration to the interests of employers and business owners doesn’t mean “decisions should be viewed under a litmus test of whether it creates jobs,” he said.
“What I’m saying is that we need to restore some balance at the NLRB,” Ring said. “Without consideration of both labor and management’s interests, there’s a risk the board creates regulations that impact job creation and job growth.”
One NLRB employee said after Ring’s speech that there’s “a concern that the implication is that we should enforce the act less,” referring to the National Labor Relations Act.
Ring rejected the implication and reiterated that he’s focused on achieving a balance. “Jobs should not be a dirty word,” he said.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)