From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
A pair of Democrats asked the labor board April 25 to assure them the agency won’t do an end run around Congress and freeze funding as part of the White House’s reported attempt to claw back billions from the spending bill passed last month.
“We remind you that Congress, not the Administration, has the ultimate authority to set funding levels for executive branch agencies,” Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) wrote in a letter, obtained by Bloomberg Law and addressed to National Labor Relations Board General Counsel Peter Robb. “Any actions to unilaterally reduce spending” would be “particularly troubling given that President Trump just recently signed bipartisan legislation that set spending levels and guidance for agencies into law,” they said.
The lawmakers also said they’re “especially troubled” by a previously undisclosed e-mail conversation that “appears” to show coordination between Robb and Michael Lotito, a management-side attorney for law firm Littler Mendelson.
Bloomberg Law initially reported that the White House Office of Management and Budget instructed the NLRB to restrict spending while President Donald Trump and a group of Republican lawmakers consider a plan to rescind some of the board’s allotment. Congress in March passed an omnibus spending bill that largely ignored Trump’s proposed 9 percent haircut for the agency.
The NLRB didn’t respond to Bloomberg Law’s previous inquiries about the spending freeze and didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on the letter.
Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta told Congress the Labor Department is discussing “a potential rescission” with the OMB after repeated questions on the matter April 17. But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) later shot down the idea, telling reporters he opposes rescission.
Murray and DeLauro said efforts to withhold appropriated funds or rework the spending package without “submitting a special message to Congress” would be “an extreme act of bad faith.” They also suggested it may be a violation of federal budget laws.
The lawmakers asked for prompt “assurances” that the agency will abide by the two federal statutes that lay out the process for budget rescissions and modifications.
Murray and DeLauro are the ranking Democrats on the Senate and House appropriations panels with authority over labor agencies.
The lawmakers also raised the issue of Robb’s plans to potentially reorganize the agency’s field offices and how it adjudicates disputes between workers, unions, and businesses.
Murray and DeLauro suggested that certain communications—made in response to a Bloomberg Law inquiry to Lotito—create the “appearance” of improper coordination between Robb and Littler.
The law firm houses one of the largest labor and employment law shops in the country and generally represents employers. Lotito heads the firm’s lobbying arm, the Workplace Policy Institute, which has an outsize presence on Capitol Hill and significant influence within labor agencies.
The NLRB in response to a request from Congress provided various documents to lawmakers related to Robb’s potential reorganization. That included an email from Lotito, informing the general counsel that Bloomberg Law had inquired about the possible changes at the agency and asking for “guidance” about how to respond.
“I cannot comment on any reorganization,” Robb told Lotito, according to copies of the exchange obtained by Bloomberg Law.
“Although you did not comment in writing, it appears that you have coordinated to some extent with Littler Mendelson in crafting or contemplating reorganization plans and that, long before Congress or the public was aware, Mr. Lotito understood you to have a ‘reorganization’” plan, DeLauro and Murray said.
Lotito referred questions to the firm. A spokesperson for Littler Mendelson didn’t respond to requests for comment.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)