From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
By Ben Penn
The Labor Department’s top lawyer has received an ethics clearance to oversee what is arguably the agency’s most controversial rulemaking, despite her father’s fingerprints on a case involving it, a DOL spokesman confirmed to Bloomberg Law.
Kate O’Scannlain, an appointee of President Donald Trump who was recently sworn in as solicitor of labor, is the daughter of Ninth Circuit Senior Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain. The judge authored a scathing dissent arguing that the Obama-era DOL rule to ban certain tip-pooling arrangements is illegal. In turn, the Trump administration issued a proposal in December to reverse that 2011 regulation by questioning the original rule’s legality. The proposed rule cites Judge O’Scannlain’s reasoning—a dissent that some attorneys felt exposed the regulation to review and reversal from the U.S. Supreme Court—that the DOL’s interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act marked an extreme abuse of agency rulemaking authority.
The solicitor, the department’s third-ranking official and most senior legal officer, is typically at the heart of a regulatory review process.
A source briefed on the matter told Bloomberg Law that it was Trump administration ethics officers who found Kate O’Scannlain didn’t need to recuse herself from participating in the rule. They determined that any conflict would only fall on her father, said the source, speaking on condition of anonymity. When asked to comment, a DOL spokesman didn’t address what role the White House or other politically appointed personnel played in the decision.
“Federal agencies have principal responsibility for the appropriateness of employees’ participation in official matters,” the department spokesman told Bloomberg Law in a written statement. “The Department of Labor’s career ethics officials have examined the tip credit matter and determined the Solicitor’s participation in this rule-making is in compliance with ethics requirements.”
A White House spokesman referred Bloomberg Law to the DOL’s comment.
The 2011 regulation asserted tips are the property of workers who earned them, including when employers pay the full minimum wage to supplement customer gratuities. That restricted businesses, especially in the restaurant industry, from requiring front-of-house workers, such as servers and bartenders, to share tips with back-of-house employees, such as cooks and dishwashers.
The new proposal is intended to free employers and their workers to structure tipping arrangements that they can all agree on, in some cases meaning lower-earning dishwashers will receive a raise. However, worker advocates and Democrats are outraged that the proposal doesn’t explicitly bar management from retaining the gratuities of workers.
The public comment period on the proposed rule ends Feb. 5, at which point the DOL will be reviewing policy and legal considerations in formulating a final rule. A former partner at management-side firm Kirkland & Ellis, O’Scannlain will be working with the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division on this rulemaking. She is now in her second week on the job, following her December Senate confirmation. The subject of her father’s dissent wasn’t broached during limited questions at her November confirmation hearing.
O’Scannlain’s 2017 ethics letter, approved by the independent Office of Government Ethics, declares that she will recuse herself from conflicted situations.
“I will recuse myself on a case-by-case basis from participation in any particular matter involving specific parties in which I determine that a reasonable person with knowledge of the relevant facts would question my impartiality in the matter, unless I am first authorized to participate,” O’Scannlain wrote Oct. 6.
Whether her involvement in the tip pool issue could actually be influenced by her father’s argument is up for debate. Regardless of the legality of the ethics clearance, O’Scannlain should have been advised to sit out this process, said Patricia Smith, the Obama adminstration’s solicitor of labor.
“We always said there are technical ethical obligations and then there are optics,” Smith, now a senior counsel at the National Employment Law Project, told Bloomberg Law. “If my father had written an opinion, I would not be participating in this.”
Paul DeCamp, who was a WHD administrator in the George W. Bush presidency, said he would defer to the ethics experts on this decision but that he saw no reason why O’Scannlain would have a conflict of interest.
“The Solicitor plainly has no personal financial interest in the matter, and it seems rather unlikely that the judge would ground his daughter if the Department were to take a position in the Final Rule contrary to his dissent,” DeCamp told Bloomberg Law via email. “Under the circumstances, it is difficult to see why recusal would be necessary or appropriate.”
DeCamp, who now represents employers at Epstein Becker Green in Washington, sued the DOL on behalf of the National Restaurant Association, arguing that the 2011 rule exceeded the agency’s authority. His high court petition seeking to invalidate the rule has been pending for a year. The litigation could be rendered moot by the DOL’s new rule.
To contact the reporter on this story: Ben Penn in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Chris Opfer at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2018 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)