Stay current on the latest developments from agencies including the CFPB, Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC to advise clients on real-life regulatory situations.
Legislation to beef up U.S. vetting of foreign investments is gaining steam even though some in the business community are worried that lawmakers will hurt U.S. firms in global deals.
Rep. Andy Barr (R-Ky.) said at a Jan. 9 hearing that he wants the bipartisan bill (H.R. 4311) to be on President Donald Trump’s desk by August. He chairs the House Financial Services Committee’s monetary policy and trade subcommittee that is considering the bill.
Bill sponsor Rep. Robert Pittenger (R-N.C.) said at the hearing that the measure has support from Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.
This is the second hearing the subcommittee has held on the issue, and there will likely be others as members move toward a vote. The first was in December.
Lawmakers in both the House and Senate have proposed updating the regulations guiding the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to make it harder for U.S. companies to merge with foreign companies in transactions where national security concerns are raised. The issue is gaining increased attention as lawmakers and administration officials question Chinese companies’ efforts to acquire U.S. firms and their technology.
The administration last week gave a thumbs down to the Chinese firm Ant Financial’s $1.2 billion proposed takeover of MoneyGram International Inc. Last September, Chinese investors led by digital map provider NavInfo Co. called off plans to buy a stake in counterpart HERE Technologies after U.S. authorities withheld approval. Major deals still under review by CFIUS include Genworth Financial Inc.’s $2.7 billion sale to China Oceanwide Holdings.
The bill would add “emerging technologies” to the CFIUS definition of “critical technologies.” The bill would require CFIUS to examine deals where foreign investors could wind up owning emerging technologies that could be essential for maintaining the U.S. technological advantage over countries that pose threats.
CFIUS now looks at foreign acquisition of existing critical technologies and “critical infrastructure” in the U.S.
The bill’s expansion of critical technologies “would open the door for CFIUS to consider economic and market impacts of Chinese technology investments across the board,” according to an analysis by the law firm Baker Botts LLC.
A Senate companion bill (S. 2098) is sponsored by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas).
Members of the House Financial Services Committee’s subcommittee on monetary policy and trade heard business community’s concerns that an expansion of CFIUS authority would hurt dealmaking and the U.S. economy.
Scott Kennedy, director of the project on Chinese business and political economy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said foreign direct investment in U.S. companies could be helped by clarifying the definitions of what transactions CFIUS covers. But he said CFIUS needs more funding and shouldn’t be overburdened by adding cases that are better handled by export-import controls.
“The American economy benefits tremendously by being open,” he said. “We want to protect what’s best for our economy by making sure our national security is protected as well.”
Before the hearing, Kennedy told Bloomberg Law that overhauling CFIUS “is only part of the solution.”
“We have to be very practical and targeted about what we’re doing. Otherwise, we’re going to make ourselves feel safe without being safe, and we’ll also hurt the U.S. economy in the process,” he said.
Former government officials with insight into CFIUS told House members that the CFIUS mandate should be clarified and expanded, but they cautioned against overburdening a resource-strapped committee with more responsibility.
A broader caseload would overwhelm a committee that is now stretching its resources, said Rod Hunter, an attorney at Baker & McKenzie and former senior director of the National Security Council.
“The ultimate consequence of a dramatic expansion of jurisdiction would be a poor performance of the committee in evaluating transactions,” Hunter told lawmakers. He said CFIUS review timelines have gotten longer, and resources are a key reason.
“I would be very cautious about what additional responsibilities are added to CFIUS,” he said.
The bill has support from some people in the national security community, but the reception from industry groups so far has largely been lukewarm, according to a House Republican aide. “None of these businesses want to lose money,” the aide told Bloomberg Law.
Kennedy told Bloomberg Law that U.S. companies that invest globally are particularly worried about expanding CFIUS’s reach. “What I’ve been hearing is that there are industry concerns, particularly among companies that do business in China or that invest globally. They’re very worried about the type of constraints the bill, as currently structured, would place on them,” he said.
Barr said at the hearing that his subcommittee is exploring how to modernize CFIUS “to better address threats without harming U.S. economic interests.”
“Can we identify the techniques we need to protect, and can we do so without making the U.S. investment climate difficult, prompting companies to move overseas,” he queried.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Fawn Johnson at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2018 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)