Keep up with the latest developments and legal issues in the telecommunications and emerging technology sectors, with exclusive access to a comprehensive collection of telecommunications law news,...
LinkedIn Corp. can’t block access to member public profile data, a federal court held in considering whether collecting data from a public website could constitute unauthorized access ( hiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp. , 2017 BL 284160, N.D. Cal., No. 17-cv-03301-EMC, preliminary injunction granted 8/14/17 ).
HiQ Labs Inc., a company that collects and analyzes LinkedIn profile data to provide employee attrition and retention analysis for its clients, sued LinkedIn after the social network threatened legal action and blocked access to its website. HiQ alleged violations of California’s constitution and unfair competition statute. LinkedIn argued that hiQ’s state claims fail because they are preempted by the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which prohibits the access of a protected computer without authorization for purposes of obtaining information.
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California said it has “serious doubt” whether hiQ’s access to the public profiles, even after LinkedIn expressly revoked permission, constituted access “without authorization” as required under the CFAA.
Under LinkedIn’s interpretation, “merely viewing a website in contravention of a unilateral directive from a private entity would be a crime effectuating the digital equivalence of Medusa,” Judge Edward M. Chen said, granting a preliminary injunction against LinkedIn. The case is the first time that LinkedIn has appeared before Chen, according to Bloomberg Law Litigation Analytics.
LinkedIn intends to “continue to fight” to allow members to control the information they make public, company spokeswoman Nicole Leverich said in a statement emailed to Bloomberg BNA.
The court distinguished the case from United States v. Nosal (Nosal II) and Facebook Inc. v. Power Ventures Inc., two appellate decisions holding that a defendant can run afoul of the CFAA by accessing a computer without permission or when permission has been explicitly revoked. The defendants in those cases, a former employee and a social media aggregator, have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the decisions.
The hiQ court said that in Facebook and Nosal II, the data at issue weren’t publicly available but rather protected by password authentication systems. “Neither of those cases confronted the precise issue presented here,” the court said.
San Francisco-based private company hiQ has raised serious questions under California’s unfair competition law as to whether LinkedIn blocked hiQ’s access for an anticompetititve purpose, the court said. HiQ had alleged LinkedIn is taking advantage of its position in the professional networking market to secure an unfair advantage in the employment data analytics market.
But hiQ hasn’t raised serious questions with its free speech claims under the California constitution, the court said.
Farella Braun & Martel LLP is representing hiQ. Munger Tolles & Olson LLP is representing LinkedIn.
To contact the reporter on this story: Alexis Kramer in Washington at aKramer@bna.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Keith Perine at firstname.lastname@example.org
The preliminary injunction order is available at http://src.bna.com/rF9.
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)