Little Guidance from IRS on Taxing Crowdfunding Contributions


We’ve all heard the stories of crowdfunding appeals that go viral. Whether it’s a musician raising money to produce an album, an inventor with a great idea, or a family in distress that needs help, crowdfunding through platforms such as Indiegogo and Kickstarter has become a common way to raise funds.

Once all the money comes pouring in, the obvious question is, “Do I have to pay taxes on the contributions, and if so, at what rate?”

Because crowdfunding is so new, there is little guidance from the IRS on how to categorize contributions for tax purposes.

In the Bloomberg BNA Tax Management Memorandum article “Crowdfunding: Federal Income Tax Considerations” (Aug. 17, 2017), Professor Charlene D. Luke of the University of Florida Levin College of Law discusses the main types of crowdfunding, available administrative guidance, relevant federal income tax rules, and possible avenues for future administrative guidance.

Crowdfunding can be divided into four main types by looking at the returns expected by the contributors to the project:

  • Donation-based crowdfunding: Money is usually raised by individuals or to help with personal needs and/or donations.  The main tax question is whether the contributions qualify as excludible gifts.
  • Reward-based crowdfunding: The contributor receives a quid pro quo commitment from the fund creator for an item of property or for performance of a service. Which tax is relevant often depends on the facts and circumstances—are the activities hobbies, for profit, or connected with an ongoing business?
  • Equity-based crowdfunding: Contributors receive an equity interest in the project. The tax law of partnerships or corporations could apply. This type of crowdfunding also raises securities law issues.
  • Debt-based crowdfunding: This involves loans rather than permanent transfers, and thus tax rules regarding interest income or other issues may apply.

In many cases, current tax law contains guidance that can be applied directly or by analogy to crowdfunding, but much of this guidance requires facts-and-circumstances decision-making.

Luke says that more IRS guidance is necessary. For example, guidance could specify a gift safe harbor for crowdfunding related to various educational or artistic productions that will be accessible to the public, where the project creator is an amateur, and the dollar amount received is below a particular threshold. Similarly, guidance regarding when a crowdfunding project rises to the level of business, and the beginning date for that business, would also address an area of uncertainty. For advance payments, the IRS could construct a deferral rule specific to crowdfunding but consistent with the deferral rules already present; it could potentially allow even cash-method taxpayers to elect into such deferral rules (which would prevent them from taking the position that the contributions were excludible gifts).

If you are a Bloomberg BNA subscriber, click here to read the full article.

Not a subscriber? Download the article here.

Get a free trial to Bloomberg BNA Tax & Accounting, a comprehensive tax research solution designed by tax practitioners for tax practitioners.