Bloomberg Law’s® extensive network of reporters and editors helps subscribers to stay ahead of legal
Cops needed a warrant to search the digital camera of an arrestee, so evidence from the search is suppressed and the resulting gun conviction is reversed, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held Aug. 14 ( Commonwealth v. Mauricio , 2017 BL 282921, Mass., SJC-12254, 8/14/17 ).
The court applied its state constitution and the logic of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Riley v. California—which held warrants are needed to search mobile phones of arrestees—to find a warrant was needed to search the camera in this case.
Cops searched Kevin A. Mauricio’s backpack after he was arrested for breaking and entering. They saw a digital camera, a stolen ring, and other items in the bag. Cops searched the camera without a warrant and saw images of Mauricio next to firearms, which led to a gun conviction. For the ring, he was convicted of receiving stolen property valued over $250.
The camera evidence should have been suppressed, the state high court said. The Massachusetts constitution grants broader rights to criminal defendants than its federal counterpart, so the logic of Riley compelled a warrant, it said. And the inventory exception to the warrant requirement doesn’t save the camera evidence, either, because inventory searches are meant to safeguard and catalog property, not to investigate crimes, it said.
But the illegal camera search didn’t taint the ring, the court said, upholding a lesser version of the stolen property conviction. Even though the prosecution proved the ring was stolen, it didn’t prove its value, the court said.
Mathew B. Zindroski of Auburndale, Mass., represented Mauricio. The Bristol County District Attorney’s Office, New Bedford, Mass., represented the commonwealth.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jordan S. Rubin in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: C. Reilly Larson at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)