From labor disputes cases to labor and employment publications, for your research, you’ll find solutions on Bloomberg Law®. Protect your clients by developing strategies based on Litigation...
McDonald’s Corp. is hiring lobbyists with Democratic ties as part of an industry push to convince lawmakers to reject the NLRB’s definition of joint employment and thus shield franchisers from having to collectively bargain with franchisee workers.
The Oak Brook, Ill.-based fast-food company has tapped firms Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck; Manatt, Phelps & Phillips; and theGROUP DC to lobby Congress on the issue.
McDonald’s and other fast-food industry players like Yum! Brands and the International Franchise Association want Congress to pass legislation to limit liability under federal labor law for businesses that use staffing, franchise, and other contract relationships.
They’re taking aim in particular at a 2015 National Labor Relations Board decision that could require franchisers as “joint employers” to collectively bargain with franchisee workers.
“Providing certainty to small businesses should be a goal of all elected officials, regardless of political affiliation” Matt Haller, the IFA’s senior vice president for communications and public affairs, told Bloomberg BNA in a May 22 email.
“The fact is that the joint employer situation that started at the NLRB has gotten more complex in the last two years, expanding into many other statutes at both the federal and state level,” Haller said. “All business-to-business relationships are now confronting the tangled web of potential joint employer law.”
Congressional Democrats have largely supported the joint employer decision, saying that it gives workers a real voice at the bargaining table. McDonald’s and other critics are hoping to convince at least some Democrats that are on the fence on joint employment that the NLRB went too far.
Using Democrats to target Democrats isn’t a new strategy, said Gregory Wawro, a political science professor at Columbia University.
“Republicans are already in favor of what corporations want, so basically you are looking for people to convince Democrats to join them, and the ones to do that are those who are Democratic lobbyists,” Wawro told Bloomberg BNA.
In addition to joint-employment, McDonald’s has been dealing with other labor-related issues, such as the group Fight for $15 seeking to raise the minimum wages of its restaurant workers.
A wide range of businesses is aggressively seeking to reverse the NLRB’s decision in Browning-Ferris Industries of California Inc.
Yum! Brands, owner of fast-food chains Taco Bell, KFC, and Pizza Hut, in 2016 tapped a team of lobbyists at Bockorny Group Inc., which included some former Democratic congressional aides. The lobbyists were tasked with “issues related to joint-employer status,” according to congressional registration documents.
That was the same year the Republican-backed Protecting Local Business Opportunity Act ( S. 2686, H.R. 3459) was floated. The measure, which would have undone the Browning-Ferris decision, stalled in both chambers.
The board in Browning-Ferris said a business may be deemed a joint employer if it indirectly controls an employment relationship or has reserved the right to do so. Employers said that decision, currently on appeal, created uncertainty for businesses operating in various contractual arrangements, including franchisers.
There have been ongoing efforts to reverse the NLRB’s ruling through methods such as riders in the appropriations for running the federal government, new legislation, and policy changes within the NLRB.
Reversal of the NLRB ruling by legislation would need bipartisan support in the Senate to avoid a filibuster. Republicans are hoping to garner some support from Democrats, especially moderates and those who are up for re-election in 2018.
That’s why it is important to aim lobbying at the specific party members, Wawro said.
“They have already got a personal relationship with those they want to influence,” he said. “They are of that institution and know how it works and that kind of experience can be invaluable for those like McDonald’s who want to change policy in their favor.”
McDonald’s and Yum! Brands didn’t responded to Bloomberg BNA’s request for comment.
McDonald’s lobbying roster this year added Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP’s Brian McKeon, a former senior counsel and legislative aide for former Sen. Barbara Boxer (D- Calif.), and David Reid, a staffer of the Hillary for America 2016 presidential campaign, according to disclosure documents.
The company is also using Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips’ James J. Bonham, a former executive director of the DCCC, chief of staff to the former Rep. Robert T. Matsui (D-Calif.), and spokesman for former Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.).
McKeon and Reid are among the firm’s team lobbying for McDonald’s on “issues related to franchisees,” in addition to appropriations. Disclosures show Bonham lobbying on behalf or McDonald’s in regards to tax and labor-related issues described as “human resources.”
McKeon, Reid, and Bonham didn’t respond to Bloomberg BNA’s request for comment.
This adds to the lobbying by Darrel Thompson, a staffer of former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and before that chief of staff to the Barack Obama for U.S. Senate campaign.
Thompson, head of firm theGROUP DC LLC in December 2015 registered lobbying on behalf or McDonald’s for “Issues related to joint employer determination and labor policy,” according to a lobbying registration form.
McDonald’s has paid theGROUP $350,000 since then, according to quarterly Congressional disclosures reviewed by Bloomberg BNA.
Thompson May 15 e-mailed Bloomberg BNA a written statement saying, “it is our company’s policy to not comment on the relationship we have nor the services we provide to any of our public or private clientele.”
It wasn’t immediately known how much McDonald’s has paid for labor-related lobbying to all firms. Some Congressional disclosure filings combine lobbying for labor with other issues such as tax reform, education, and food issues.
To contact the reporter on this story: Tyrone Richardson in Washington at email@example.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)