Trust Bloomberg Tax's Premier International Tax offering for the news and guidance to navigate the complex tax treaty networks and business regulations.
By Jan Stojaspal
McDonald’s in Poland likely won’t be able to challenge value-added tax treatment of eat-in meals after the Supreme Administrative Court quashed a franchisee lawsuit.
The court’s April 5 decision said McDonald’s Corp. in Poland can’t charge a 5 percent VAT on the meals. The decision will likely stop all similar lawsuits that have been initiated since the Polish Ministry of Finance declared in 2016 that all fast-food meals are subject to an 8 percent VAT rate, regardless of how they are served or consumed, local tax practitioners told Bloomberg Tax.
“I would not see any sense in continuing other litigations with” the tax authorities “regarding this particular type of business,” Przemyslaw Powierza, a tax partner at RSM Poland, said in an April 9 email. “There is a very small chance, that another” McDonald’s “would get another ruling.”
But since the court’s decision only concerned eat-in meals, lawsuits defending the right to charge 5 percent VAT on to-go meals may still succeed, Powierza said.
The court’s decision is significant for both McDonald’s, whose franchisees have been forced to repay millions of euro in VAT adjustments since 2016, and other major fast-food operators. For example, Wroclaw-based AmRest Holdings SE, owner and operator of 246 KFC, 106 Pizza Hut, and 41 Burger King locations in Poland, which continue to charge 5 percent VAT on at least some fast-food meals.
“We are the market leader, and, of course, this is a situation that affects the whole industry, not just McDonald’s, so I am sure we are closely watched,” Anna Borys-Karwacka, a spokeswoman at McDonald’s Polska, said April 4.
McDonald’s currently has 403 restaurants in Poland, 322 of which are owned by franchisees. McDonald franchisees have filed more than 123 lawsuits since 2016, Borys-Karwacka said.
McDonald’s adopted 8 percent VAT across all types of orders in 2016 to minimize business risk to its franchisees, Borys-Karwacka said. But in the case decided April 5, the McDonald’s Gdansk-based franchisee defended the right to charge a 5 percent rate, arguing that fast-food orders should be considered “ready meals,” according to court documents.
The court’s decision “is final and binding and ends the proceedings in this particular case,” Borys-Karwacka said in an April 7 email. “We are waiting for the written substantiation of the judgment. After analyzing it along with our advisors, we will take further steps to develop best approach to secure our franchisees’ business. We are determined to end this matter in the way which is auspicious for the entire system.”
AmRest still charges 8 percent VAT on dine-in meals and 5 percent on to-go meals, a decision that is “driven by the local laws and regulation as well as interpretations by the Polish Ministry of Finance,” Iwona Sarachman, a spokeswoman at AmRest, said in an April 3 email. She declined to comment on the McDonald’s case.
The Supreme Administrative Court is Poland’s court of last resort for administrative cases, and written justifications usually take a month.
The McDonald’s franchisee brought the lawsuit to contest a Nov. 10, 2016, tax authority decision that required the franchisee to pay an unspecified VAT adjustment for 2011 after the tax authority concluded that the franchisee’s taxable activities should be classified as providing services and not ready meals.
This decision was upheld April 7, 2017, by a higher-level tax authority. But the Provincial Administrative Court in Gdansk challenged the decision on Aug. 22, 2017 saying it wasn’t convinced that the tax authority demonstrated that serving meals—made with semi-finished products by employees who are not required to have an “education in the direction of gastronomy” and served on plastic trays without plates or cutlery, among other considerations—fulfilled the definition of a restaurant service.
Until 2016, the Polish Ministry of Finance tolerated the fact that fast-food outlets used 5 percent VAT on to-go meals, Tomasz Wagner, a senior tax manager with Ernst & Young Tax Advisory in Warsaw, said April 4.
But then some chains took things too far, and the Ministry of Finance pushed back with the 2016 change, Wagner said.
“The way of offering these products, whether separately or in sets, such as a meat sandwich, fries with a drink, a tortilla, or baked potatoes with a drink, does not affect the way” they are classified for VAT, the ministry said in guidance.
It further makes no difference, if the point of sale is located in a public place, it features tables and chairs, tableware is available, the products are intended for on-site or take-out consumption, or if the point of sale comes with toilets, a coat check, is air-conditioned or heated, according to the guidance.
“This is what happens if the taxpayers try to push the system to the limit,” Wagner said. “Five percent was OK for the market, and nobody was against it, including the ministry. But at a certain point the biggest taxpayers started to think about optimizations of different kinds.”
For example, at least one change divided coffee into the ingredient, subject to 23 percent VAT, and the service, subject to 8 percent VAT, Wagner said.
“This started looking stupid on printouts from cash registers,” he said.
Meanwhile, others pushed the limits by starting to charge 5 percent VAT on orders that were eaten in restaurants, Wagner said.
McDonald’s started using 5 percent VAT for drive-thru orders in 2012, and for in-store orders in 2015, according to Borys-Karwacka.
There are two arguments for using 5 percent VAT on fast-food meals, she said.
One is that the Polish statistical classification of goods and services, which is how VAT rates are determined in Poland, shouldn’t be the starting point.
“You first have to assess whether the situation is selling services or goods, and there are cases of the European Court of Justice which consider this particular situation, and they underline some important elements of a restaurant service like waiters, reusable tableware, the possibility to book a table, etc.,” she said.
The other is the need for entrepreneurs to be able to trust “in the rule of law and to have legal certainty, which is basis for business decisions,“ she said. ”We acted in good faith, and our tax administration confirmed many times that what we do is right, and we based our business decisions on that.”
The 2016 guidance helped clarify VAT rates for fast-food restaurants, but more work will be done as part of a planned general overhaul of how goods and services are classified for VAT purposes, according to Lukasz Swierzewski, a spokesman for the Polish Ministry of Finance.
The existing classification system, which is based heavily on the European Union’s statistical classification of products by activity and administered by Poland’s Central Statistical Office, is often imprecise and can cause similar products to be taxed at different levels, he said.
He added that the idea is to replace it with a system based on the EU’s Combined Nomenclature (CN). The CN is a classification tool that meets requirements of the Common Customs Tariff and the EU’s external trade statistics.
“Definitely we would like to clarify” VAT rates for the fast-food industry further, he told Bloomberg Tax April 4. A single rate-rate approach will most likely be maintained, Swierzewski said.
“I don’t think that we are going to have two different VAT rates because we would like to have the easiest possible classification,” he said. The level of that one VAT rate is still under discussion, he said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jan Stojaspal in Prague at email@example.com
To contact the editor on this story: Penny Sukhraj at firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright © 2018 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)