Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
Regulations on the venting and flaring of natural gas survived a Senate attempt to nix them but may not be so lucky with an Interior Department eager to whittle them down or kill them altogether.
“The department has reviewed and flagged the waste-prevention rule as one we will suspend, revise or rescind given its significant regulatory burden that encumbers American energy production, economic growth and job creation,” said Kate MacGregor, acting assistant secretary of the Interior for land and minerals, in a statement issued after the Senate vote.
Oil and gas companies have already begun doing work to prepare for the rule’s first notable compliance deadline—Jan. 17, 2018. Many companies such as Continental Resources Inc., Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and Devon Energy Corp. operate on federal and tribal lands primarily in Western states.
The Senate May 10 rejected, on a 49-51 vote, a motion to consider a resolution that would have killed the Interior rule issued in November requiring cuts in methane and other emissions from oil and gas operations on federal and tribal lands. The vote—which represented the Senate’s only chance to overturn the regulation under the Congressional Review Act—put the ball back in Interior’s court on the waste prevention rule, written by the Bureau of Land Management.
“The rule is expected to have real and harmful impacts on onshore energy development and could impact state and local jobs and revenue,” MacGregor said. “Small independent oil and gas producers in states like North Dakota, Colorado and New Mexico, which account for a substantial portion of our nation’s energy wealth, could be hit the hardest.”
Defenders of the rule in the Senate said it will reduce waste and help protect human health and the environment. Methane, the primary constituent of natural gas, is a potent greenhouse gas.
The companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
“From my perspective, this is the most onerous new regulation,” said Kari Cutting, vice president of the North Dakota Petroleum Council, when she spoke to Bloomberg BNA in advance of the Senate vote.
North Dakota has many wells in which gas is burned off, or flared, because not enough gas pipeline infrastructure exists to take the gas to markets when it comes to the surface along with oil.
“This regulation will particularly impact small-producing, marginal wells located on federal lands. Shutting in these smaller wells means less royalties will get sent back to the federal Treasury,” said Barry Russell, president of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, in a statement expressing disappointment at the Senate vote.
“IPAA looks forward to working with the Interior Department on a targeted, meaningful solution,” Russell said.
The prospect of Interior action is one reason Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) voted against nullifying the regulations, though it meant going against most of his fellow Republicans. Two other Republicans voting against nullification were Maine’s Susan Collins and South Carolina’s Lindsey Graham.
“I believe that the public interest is best served if the Interior Department issues a new rule to revise and improve the BLM methane rule,” McCain said in a statement explaining his vote.
He said he was especially troubled by the Congressional Review Act provision that says no “substantially similar” rule can be issued after the Senate has rescinded a rule under the act.
Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) expressed very similar reasons for opposing the rollback—anticipating Interior will revise the rule and not wanting to tie the hands of regulators with a vote that would bar any substantially similar rule. There had been much speculation that she would vote with most Republicans.
Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), who introduced the Congressional Review Act resolution to kill the BLM rule, told reporters he was disappointed but would follow up with Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to get the rule withdrawn immediately.
“I’m going to have that discussion with him shortly,” said Barrasso, chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. “I’ve talked to him before. He knows how so many of us feel about this rule.”
Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), a defender of the BLM rule and the ranking member of the committee, said it was not a total surprise that McCain voted against the rollback.
“He’s a maverick. He’s a free spirit,” Carper said. “I think he looked at the facts, and—this is a way for us to conserve the resources that belong to all of the public, it’s the way to actually provide additional revenues to Treasury at a time we very much need those, and this is a way for us to actually improve the quality of our air.”
Litigation against the rule is expected to continue. Lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming by the state governments of Montana, North Dakota, Texas and Wyoming and by two industry groups, Western Energy Alliance and the Independent Petroleum Association of America.
The states and industry associations said the BLM exceeded its authority by trying to regulate air emissions, an Environmental Protection Agency responsibility ( Wyoming v. Interior, D. Wyo., No. 2:16-cv-285, 11/18/16 ).
The litigation would have gone away if the Senate had nullified the rule, Kathleen Sgamma, president of Western Energy Alliance, told Bloomberg BNA before the vote.
The most recent actions in the consolidated litigation were requests for a briefing schedule to argue the merits of the cases.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Paul Connolly at PConnolly@bna.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)