Rely on Occupational Safety & Health ReporterSM for full news coverage and documentation of federal and state workplace safety and health programs, standards, legislation,...
Increasing numbers of U.S. employers are embracing the notion that protecting worker safety is good for business, David Michaels, head of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, told BNA Jan. 4.
“It's hard for me to judge overall changes,” Michaels said, “but I certainly have seen many employers recognize that managing for safety is useful not only to prevent injuries and fatalities, but in fact leads to a more profitable company. And I believe that's being embraced much more widely.”
For example, at recent meeting of oil and gas companies, an executive of Netherlands-based chemical giant LyondellBasell, said, according to Michaels (who was paraphrasing), “The message from the top here is, you manage for safety, everything else follows.”
Michaels cited Paul O'Neill, former chief executive of aluminum producer Alcoa who also served as President George W. Bush's Treasury secretary, as an example of someone who embraced this philosophy.
“It's what ExxonMobil does,” Michaels added. “We see that that's effective, and I think it's putting to rest the canard that employers save money by exposing workers to hazards. In fact, well-managed, profitable companies manage for safety.”
At the same time, however, Michaels said he recognizes that a large segment of American businesses have not accepted that doctrine.
“There are many, many other employers who are unaware of our standards, or have some idea that they might be making a mistake, or that there might be a violation, but for whatever reason don't feel like they need to abate that hazard immediately,” he said.
For that reason, the agency deploys “different tools for different types of employers, but many of those tools all focus on the same thing: saying not just, 'Abate hazards,' but really, 'Change what you're doing in the workplace in a way that makes a big difference and that will really reduce injury and illness,' ” Michaels said.
Among the tools he cited is the press release, which OSHA uses to publicize citations as a way of deterring other employers from violating the law.
Some employer groups have complained about OSHA's press releases, arguing that they defame companies before the allegations are proven (42 OSHR 1117, 12/13/12).
But Michaels defended OSHA's use of the press release, calling it “a common law enforcement technique to discourage others from getting in that same situation. And I think it's been effective. We have to look at the effectiveness of all our tools, and it's one of the arrows in our quiver.”
Michaels also spoke about OSHA's progress in the oil and gas sector, noting that the agency has poured substantial resources into the effort because of the magnitude of the hazards involved.
OSHA, in conjunction with industry leaders, recently staged a safety stand-down, “where really the entire industry stopped for a day, and hundreds of people went to the Oklahoma City civic center for a safety meeting,” Michaels said.
Another safety stand-down in the oil and gas sector is scheduled in North Dakota later in January, with more to come in Texas and Wyoming, according to Michaels. Participation in the stand-downs is voluntary, he said.
In June 2012, OSHA and the National Institution for Occupational Safety and Health jointly issued a hazard alert about the dangers of silica exposure during hydraulic fracturing operations, which Michaels said resulted from a teleconference with “100 different leaders of the field” (42 OSHR 576, 6/28/12).
“We continue to work very closely with the industry, [which] has really stepped up to the plate and is developing ways to reduce exposure and eliminate the risk of silicosis,” Michaels said. “But it's worth noting that that industry continues to have a very high fatality rate. So we're very much focused on working with the industry to reduce that rate.”
Michaels confirmed that OSHA will use NIOSH's diacetyl risk assessment in its own rulemaking, a step that is expected to shorten the lengthy rulemaking process.
“We're pleased with that approach,” he said. “It didn't make sense to me to have agencies doing separate risk assessments. It's a waste of resources.”
Even though diacetyl is no longer a high-priority risk, because its use is largely contained, Michaels said more such collaborations with NIOSH will be forthcoming.
“It's the way Congress wrote the OSHA law, and we think it's what the American people expect,” he said.
On the topic of rulemaking generally, Michaels said OSHA's relationship with the White House Office of Management and Budget has been fruitful.
“I think we work very closely together. I think we learn from each other. I think certainly with Cass Sunstein, we worked together very closely,” Michaels said, referring to the former chief of OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
“We look forward to [Sunstein's] replacement,” he said. “Many of the things we're working on were influenced by Cass, in terms of the approach of behavioral economics: recognizing that it's better to encourage and incentivize action, rather than prescribe it.”
When asked about his top frustrations on the job, Michaels pointed to the challenge of getting his message through to hard-to-reach employers.
“I spend a lot of time speaking to the converted, preaching to the choir,” he said. “I'm invited to many different groups of employers and trade associations, but the ones who invite me are the ones generally who already recognize that I'm there to help them get to the place they already know they want to get to. It's much harder to reach employers who aren't plugged into those associations and who don't understand the fact that they could be more profitable by being more safe.”
By Stephen Lee
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)