Daily Tax Report: State provides authoritative coverage of state and local tax developments across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, tracking legislative and regulatory updates,...
Che Odom Ryan C. Tuck Washington Deputy News Director
By Che Odom
Procedural disconnects exist in the way the new federal partnership audit rules work and the way state statutes governing reporting of federal adjustments are currently worded.
That’s according to Dan De Jong, a senior manager in KPMG LLP’s Washington National State and Local Tax Group.
“There are significant disconnects that I think could result in a lot of uncertainty,” he said March 24 at a meeting in Washington of the National Conference of State Legislatures’ Task Force on State and Local Taxation. Such disconnects are related to who must represent a partnership during an audit at the federal and state levels and how states should treat imputed underpayment of taxes.
De Jong, an attorney and tax practitioner, is working with a group to develop for states a model partnership audit statute that would address such nagging questions, he said. Work on the model law may be nearly complete.
The model law should be ready in plenty of time for the first audits under the new federal regime. Those wouldn’t be until 2020, according to practitioners who have been working on it since the federal Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, which took effect Jan. 1, created a centralized federal partnership audit regime.
The practitioners, known as the “interested parties,” come from several groups. Those organizations include the Council On State Taxation (COST), Tax Executives Institute Inc., the Institute for Professionals in Taxation, the American Institute of CPAs, and a task force of the American Bar Association tax section’s State and Local Tax Committee.
When the model statute is complete, the Multistate Tax Commission will consider whether to formally adopt and endorse it to states, Helen Hecht, general counsel to the MTC, has told Bloomberg Tax. However, many states have already been looking at the drafts of the model act as the work has progressed, and some states, including California, have already begun to move on the issues, she said.
The interested parties, most of which consist of tax professionals representing businesses, hope state lawmakers delay adopting laws until their model is ready. They say the statute would promote uniformity across states and predictability for taxpayers, making compliance easier.
One of the disconnects is that it wasn’t clear to De Jong what the imputed underpayment is at the federal level.
“That is the payment that a partnership would make after receiving its audit adjustments and electing to pay the tax on those audit adjustments,” he said. “Is that a tax on the partnership? Is that a tax that is really the tax of the partners but paid by the partnership? I think that is unclear.”
Most states don’t tax partnerships at the entity level, which means it’s difficult to know without changes at the state level what the implication would be of a federal audit adjustment and payment at the partnership level, he said.
The new model statute would address imputed underpayment, as well as who could serve as the partnership representative at the state level, Jonathan Horn, senior manager at the American Institute of CPAs, said during the task force meeting.
A partnership representative is an individual who is, at the federal level, given the authority to make decisions related to the audit for the partnership, De Jong said.
The role is a new one, which takes over what used to be a tax managing partner under old rules, De Jong said. The model uniform statute should help clarify whether the federal partnership representative’s authority carries over to the state level or whether a state would allow someone else such decision-making authority.
To contact the reporter on this story: Che Odom in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ryan C. Tuck at email@example.com
Copyright © 2018 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)