Daily Tax Report: State provides authoritative coverage of state and local tax developments across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, tracking legislative and regulatory updates,...
By Tripp Baltz
A Multistate Tax Commission committee will revisit its model uniform statute for reporting and notice requirements on remote sellers that don’t collect and remit state sales and use taxes.
The MTC Uniformity Committee decided March 9 to relaunch work on its Model Sales and Use Tax Notice and Reporting Statute, which it set aside in May 2012 pending a decision over Colorado’s reporting and notice law. In December 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the Direct Marketing Association’s (now Data & Marketing Association) appeal of an earlier ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit that the Colorado law is constitutional ( Brohl v. Direct Mktg. Ass’n, U.S., No. 16-458, petition for review denied 12/12/16 ).
Colorado and the DMA recently entered into a settlement agreement under which DMA members will begin complying with Colorado’s reporting and notice law effective July 1, and will owe the state no penalties for past periods.
The MTC model statute essentially incorporates the elements of Colorado’s law, approved by the state General Assembly in 2010—out-of-state vendors that don’t collect and remit taxes must provide reports on sales to the DOR, as well as send similar reports to buyers and provide them with notice that they may owe sales and use taxes on purchases. A handful of states have introduced bills to create similar regimes this year.
Sheldon Laskin, MTC counsel, told the Uniformity Committee March 8 that a staff review of the model statute concluded it could be adopted in its current form—with one addition. Because the model law is intended for adoption in multiple states, it might be appropriate to consider adding a provision to clarify where a non-collecting retailer should make the required reports if it is unclear where the purchased property will be used.
Phil Horwitz, tax policy director for the Colorado Department of Revenue, said the Colorado law requires the vendor to report to the state where the gift is shipped, with the billing address as a fallback only in cases of digital goods. He said the question merits further consideration, and he agreed to chair a work group of the Uniformity Committee to examine the model statute.
Also March 8 the Uniformity Committee directed its partnership work group to take up a proposal from New Mexico to consider model entity-level tax on partnerships, LLCs and business entities.
Helen Hecht, MTC general counsel, gave the committee a comprehensive update on the group’s focus on recent federal and state changes in tax law governing partnerships. Most of the presentation focused on changes triggered by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, which gives the Internal Revenue Service the authority to audit and assess complex partnerships at the partnership level.
The new partnership audit regime has big implications for states, which already have statutes and regulations requiring taxpayers to report federal adjustments, along with related state taxes due. As the IRS works to develop new regulations, the MTC work group is focused on best practices for states to adopt in areas that will affect them, such as how to calculate state-level imputed underpayment of partnership taxes.
The committee also received an update from a work group focusing on changes to Section 18 of the Multistate Tax Compact Article IV, the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act, necessitated by the MTC’s recent adoption of market-based sourcing rules. The Section 18 work group is examining how state taxing agencies should handle issues of distortion in business income apportionment.
In recent months, the group has been meeting once a week to hammer out a proposed model regulation for apportioning the income of entities that lack “receipts” derived from transactions and activities in the regular course of business. The rules are necessary because many states have eliminated the property and payroll factors from their apportionment formulas.
“That means it’s possible that a non-operational subsidiary could have apportionable base income, but no apportionment factors,” said Bruce Fort, MTC counsel tasked to the work group. The group believes the draft model rule, which would try to avoid “nowhere assignment” or “double assignment” of receipts, is nearing completion, Fort said.
Fort said the group also has been working on language for a provision similar to one in the new market-based sourcing language in the compact, Article IV, Section 17, for “throwing out” gross receipts in situations where the regulation would otherwise assign those receipts to a jurisdiction in which the taxpayer is not taxable.
To contact the reporter on this story: Tripp Baltz in Denver at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Ryan C. Tuck at firstname.lastname@example.org
The agenda for the March meeting of the MTC Uniformity Committee is http://www.mtc.gov/Uniformity/Uniformity-Committee/2017/Uniformity-Committee-Meeting-3-2017
Copyright © 2017 Tax Management Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)