Bloomberg Law’s combination of innovative analytics, research tools and practical guidance provides you with everything you need to be a successful litigator.
Dec. 13 — Multiple Gerber baby food labels and their role in class certification in a false advertising suit was the focal point of oral argument at the Ninth Circuit Dec. 13 ( Bruton v. Gerber Prod. Co., 9th Cir., No. 15-15174, oral argument 12/13/16 ).
Natalia Bruton alleged deceptive statements about the nutritional benefits of Gerber products made them seem healthier than competitors’ baby foods.
But the Ninth Circuit judges were concerned about a piece of the ascertainability puzzle to certify a class: What plaintiffs must offer to show membership in the purchasing class.
The appeals panel questioned whether prospective class members could accurately recall what they had bought, given the 69 products and multiple labels involved.
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California previously declined to certify a class, finding it would be asking too much of a consumer’s memory.
Federal courts diverge on the legal standard for class membership.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has imposed a tough burden on plaintiffs. It has disallowed self-identifiation and asked for objective evidence such as a purchase receipt.
The Seventh Circuit has held that ascertainability is met as long as the class definition is spelled out clearly and objectively.
The court also endorsed class members’ ability to self-identify through affidavits when other means of identification aren’t available.
The Ninth Circuit hasn’t yet weighed in on the issue.
Attorney Pierce Gore, representing the plaintiffs, said Natalia Bruton kept packaging of the specific products she bought, and remembered her baby food purchases.
Gore, with Pratt & Associates in San Jose, also said the plaintiffs “would be fine” with the standard set by the Seventh Circuit.
But Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr. asked Gore, “How would you litigate?” the case regardless of what legal standard were to apply.
Smith said he has children and knowledge of baby food products and “can’t imagine” other class members being as meticulous as Bruton.
Gore said class members self-identify in small-dollar consumer suits, and a claims administrator would weed out improper claims later.
Judge Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain noted that a different Ninth Circuit panel is considering Briseno v. ConAgra Foods Inc., No. 15-55727, which also raises the ascertainability question, and brought up Ninth Circuit policy of deferring to the first panel that has a particular issue.
Gore said the plaintiffs “would be fine with that.”
During argument in the Briseno case, which involves Wesson oil, judges were skeptical of ConAgra Foods Inc.'s arguments against self-identification as a means to show membership in the purchasing class.
But that case, argued in September, involved a consistent label statement and few product varieties.
Attorney Bryan Merryman, who argued for Gerber, urged the panel to decide the Bruton case without waiting for Briseno.
The Ninth Circuit could affirm the denial of class status on the same facts the district court did, and for reasons other than ascertainability, he said: The myriad label variations mean there’s no predominance of common issues, and a class wouldn’t be manageable.
Merryman is with White & Case LLP in Los Angeles.
The court also homed in on whether Bruton showed a reasonable consumer would be deceived by the labeling, which included statements that the baby food was an “excellent source” or a “good source” of various vitamins and minerals.
The district court granted summary judgment to Gerber, ruling that the plaintiff didn’t show the statements were deceptive.
Bruton testified she was deceived by the label, but “she can’t speak for the class,” Judge O’Scannlain said.
Merryman told the panel Bruton offered no evidence to show that a significant portion of the consuming public would likely be deceived by the baby food label statements.
Judges Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Ronald M. Gould and Milan D. Smith, Jr. heard argument.
To contact the reporter on this story: Julie A. Steinberg in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Steven Patrick at email@example.com
Copyright © 2016 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)