For the professional edge in your day-to-day practice, rely on the most timely, objective reporting on significant developments, trends, and emerging patterns in criminal law today—Criminal Law...
There wasn’t enough evidence for a murder conviction, and the Michigan Supreme Court wrongly applied a U.S. Supreme Court case to find otherwise, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held Aug. 15 ( Tanner v. Yukins , 2017 BL 284727, 6th Cir., No. 15-1691, 8/15/17 ).
The circuit court applied Jackson v. Virginia, a case dealing with sufficiency of the evidence, to vacate a murder conviction in a case with “several gaps” in the evidence, the appeals court said.
Hattie Tanner was convicted of murder in Michigan state court for the deadly stabbing of a bartender. There was testimony that Tanner was in the bar parking lot around the time of the murder and that the knife used for the crime was hers. Blood at the scene matched Tanner’s type, according to the trial testimony.
The district court denied habeas relief, finding that the Michigan Supreme Court rightly held on appeal that the evidence was sufficient.
But the state court unreasonably applied Jackson, which asks if “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt,” the circuit court said.
The gaps in the evidence—none of it directly implicated Tanner—combined with exculpatory evidence—an unknown woman’s blood was on the victim’s shirt—shows that a rational jury wouldn’t have convicted, it said.
Judge Karen Nelson Moore wrote the opinion, joined by Senior Judge Martha Craig Daughtrey and Judge Raymond M. Kethledge.
Jones Day, Columbus, Ohio, represented Tanner. The Office of the Michigan Attorney General, Lansing, Mich., represented the state.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jordan S. Rubin in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: C. Reilly Larson at email@example.com
Copyright © 2017 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)