Turn to the nation's most objective and informative daily environmental news resource to learn how the United States and key players around the world are responding to the environmental...
Jan. 27 --The Environmental Protection Agency did not adequately consider job losses when it issued various air pollution regulations impacting coal consumption, Murray Energy Corp. said in a notice of intent to sue the agency.
The company said in its notice letter that the EPA's air pollution rules for industrial boilers, power plants and ambient air pollution unduly burden sources that burn coal either by setting more stringent emissions standards than other fuel types or by providing incentives to switch to other fuels such as natural gas.
The agency's rules violate Section 321 of the Clean Air Act, which directs the agency to consider the job impacts of its regulations, the company said. The lawsuit seeks to compel the EPA to evaluate potential job losses in the coal industry as part of its various air pollution regulations.
The notice letter was sent to the EPA on Jan. 21, and the company announced it Jan. 27.
“The pressure the current administration is placing on the power sector to switch from coal to other fuels and to avoid the construction of new coal-burning facilities has threatened one of the nation's largest markets for coal and, in turn, the jobs and livelihoods of all those who work in and support our nation's coal industry, including Murray Energy's 7,100 employees,” the company's letter said. “This is precisely the type of significant potential job loss that Congress mandated EPA to evaluate, continuously, in administering and enforcing the Clean Air Act.”
The company is required by the Clean Air Act to notify the EPA of its intent to sue 60 days prior to filing the citizen lawsuit. The EPA could not be reached for comment.
Murray Energy said the EPA's rules encourage industries to consume less coal or shift to natural gas. Additionally, the agency's air quality standards for particulate matter and sulfur dioxide encourage states to develop their own regulations to limit emissions from industrial sources that burn coal.
Murray also argued that the EPA is unfairly targeting power plants that burn coal for air pollution enforcement actions that either force facilities to close or switch to natural gas. The company said the EPA's regulations provide incentives to switch from coal to natural gas, causing job losses in the coal industry. Murray said the EPA has a nondiscretionary duty under the Clean Air Act to evaluate those job losses as part of its review of its air pollution regulations.
“Over the past five years, EPA has waged what can fairly be described as a war on coal, repeatedly and consistently encouraging sources to switch from coal to other fuels, to shut down coal-fired sources, and to avoid constructing new coal-fired sources, all through EPA's administration and enforcement of the Clean Air Act,” the company's letter said. “You have a nondiscretionary duty under CAA § 321(a) to continuously evaluate the employment effects of these actions but have failed to do so. Your failure to fulfill this duty prevents Murray Energy from obtaining and using EPA's continuous evaluations of employment effects to address and ameliorate the devastating economic consequences of EPA's actions on the coal industry.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Childers in Washington at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Larry Pearl at firstname.lastname@example.org
Murray Energy's notice of intent to sue the EPA is available at http://op.bna.com/env.nsf/r?Open=rlen-9frsup.
All Bloomberg BNA treatises are available on standing order, which ensures you will always receive the most current edition of the book or supplement of the title you have ordered from Bloomberg BNA’s book division. As soon as a new supplement or edition is published (usually annually) for a title you’ve previously purchased and requested to be placed on standing order, we’ll ship it to you to review for 30 days without any obligation. During this period, you can either (a) honor the invoice and receive a 5% discount (in addition to any other discounts you may qualify for) off the then-current price of the update, plus shipping and handling or (b) return the book(s), in which case, your invoice will be cancelled upon receipt of the book(s). Call us for a prepaid UPS label for your return. It’s as simple and easy as that. Most importantly, standing orders mean you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you’re relying on. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.960.1220 or by sending an email to email@example.com.
Put me on standing order at a 5% discount off list price of all future updates, in addition to any other discounts I may quality for. (Returnable within 30 days.)
Notify me when updates are available (No standing order will be created).
This Bloomberg BNA report is available on standing order, which ensures you will all receive the latest edition. This report is updated annually and we will send you the latest edition once it has been published. By signing up for standing order you will never have to worry about the timeliness of the information you need. And, you may discontinue standing orders at any time by contacting us at 1.800.372.1033, option 5, or by sending us an email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Put me on standing order
Notify me when new releases are available (no standing order will be created)